|
Early
Plans
As
soon as the war was over the BBC knew they would need to build a
'television centre'. They acquired Lime Grove Studios and
shortly afterwards the Shepherds Bush Empire (Television Theatre) and
Riverside Studios but these were stop-gaps and the intention was to
move all television production into this new purpose built
centre. A site of 13 acres, previously occupied by part of the
Franco-British Exhibition was bought shortly after the war.
This 140 acre exhibition had consisted of several highly ornate
pavilions all faced in white which came to give this area of London
just north of Shepherds Bush the name 'White City.'
Following
the original exhibition and - let us not forget! - the 1908 Olympic
Games, the buildings hosted several other exhibitions and
expositions. (What's the difference?) The last time the
site was employed for its original purpose was for the British
Industries Fair in 1929 although some areas were used for 'textile
fairs' until 1937. During the war some of the buildings
were commandeered for the manufacture of parachutes. In 1936
much of the site was taken over by Hammersmith council who built the
South Africa Estate of flats surrounding the stadium.
(Incidentally,
the only remaining buildings dating from the exhibition were
demolished as recently as 2004, when the site on the other side of
Wood Lane was cleared prior to construction of a huge new retail park.)
By
1949 the remainder of the site was derelict and the BBC purchased 13
acres originally occupied by the 'court of honour' - although several
councillors objected strongly and thought that the land should have
been used for housing. The only thing that remains of this
extraordinary, spectacular exhibition site is a 2m square of
terracotta tiles on the ground outside TC1.
|
 |
|
The
original White City. Part of the 'Court of Honour' in the 1908
Franco-British Exhibition. This picture shows a fraction
of this extraordinary development of palaces and pavilions.
It's hard to believe that Television Centre now occupies this land. |
The
story of how architect Graham Dawbarn came up with the design is well
documented but I'll repeat it anyway. Given a fifty-page brief
he retreated to a pub for inspiration and with a plan of the
oddly-shaped site in his head he pondered on the problem. How
to fit eight to ten studios in this area - giving easy access to
scenery and separately to artists, crew and audiences. Gazing
at it for a few seconds he doodled a question mark on an envelope and
the penny dropped. The shape was perfect.
|
 |
The
famous back-of-an envelope doodle that started it all. Note
the year on the postmark. |
He
would build most of the studios around a circular hub containing
video recorders in the basement - so cable lengths to each studio
were minimized. Around that would be dressing rooms in the
basement and on ground floor level. The studios would be spread
outside a circular corridor on the ground floor in a large/small
alternate pattern, enabling crush bars or 'assembly areas' to occupy
some of the space next to the smaller studios. On first floor
level above the dressing rooms and assembly areas would be the studio
control rooms and apparatus rooms - all with easy access to each other.
The
fan of studios would create wedges between them where other areas
could be fitted - camera stores, prop stores, dimmer rooms and even a
small puppet studio. A larger wedge between two of the studios
would contain a wide access route between the front and back of the
studios on the ground floor whilst above this would be the
transmission suites, presentation studios, telecine areas and central
apparatus room. Outside the studios would be a covered road or
'runway' enabling scenery to move between studios and to and from the
scenery block - a large construction connecting the main block at the
rear of the building. Outside the scenery runway would be a
road enabling vehicles to move easily round the site. The
circle of studios would extend along a spur that could be built in
phases with more studios as and when required over the years.
The spur would connect with the scenery runway at the back and the
artists' corridor at the front.
A
concept plan was drawn up, a model made, and in 1951 construction
began on the first building - the scenery block. However, the
foundation stone for the main block was not in fact laid until
1956. There was a pause of a few years before building could
commence on the studios. The government was going through
financially straitened times following the war and they could not
afford the huge capital investment that was required to be
borrowed. As it transpired, the delay was to the good as the
plans could be further developed and refined.
The
original plans had some of the studios rather different from the way
they ended up. TC2, 5 and 7 were eventually built as originally
conceived. However, TC1 and 6 were going to be the same size as
each other - a very long and relatively narrow 75 x 120ft wall to
wall with a grid height of 45ft. More interestingly, TC3 and
TC4 were initially both planned to be a similar 75 ft wide and 120 ft
long but the end 40ft was to have a grid height of 60ft enabling
scenery to be flown as in a theatre. (These dimensions are
taken from a magazine article dated 27th May 1950.) The
enforced pause before building commenced brought about a squaring-off
of the studios, an early plan to make TC6 divisible into two and a
realisation that TC1 could lengthen to occupy the scenery runway
space and widen by 25ft without ruining the concept of the whole building.
|
 |
|
The
model of the original concept. Note that it indicates that 10
production studios were originally planned and that TC6 was going to
be the same way round as the other studios. TC3 and TC4 both
have scenery fly towers in this model. Note also how much of
the site is occupied by the scenery building. The part of the
scenery block on the far right did not end up this shape and in fact
this area became occupied by the paint frame and later the 'EBX'
building and offices.
Of
course, other differences include the absence of the East Tower,
which was constructed in 1964 on top of the 'works' building shown
just above the scenery block here, and the multistorey car park which
was built in the 1980s on the other side of the Hammersmith and City
railway viaduct. On the lower left is the restaurant
block. The interesting construction that occupies the far left
of the garden was never built but the single storey one at the right
hand end of the garden became TC9 - from the mid '90s for a decade
this was the CBBC continuity studio. |
The
building was intended to be constructed in phases or 'stages'.
This highly confusing term is still in use at TVC today. Thus
you will see signs indicating 'Stage 5' or 'Stage 6.' Most
people in the industry would naturally assume these to direct the
observer to a studio, given the nature of the building. But
no. Stages 5 and 6 were construction phases and have come
to refer to parts of the building.
Another
BBC term that is often taken for granted is the naming of
studios. To avoid confusion every BBC studio in the country was
given a unique name with prefix letters relating to its
building. Thus 'TC1' is Television Centre studio 1.
Allegedly, a few years ago the newly appointed head of BBC Resources
decided that this was misleading as visitors might think that TC1 was
a telecine suite, not a studio. Thus all the hundreds of signs
around the building now
read 'studio
x'. Nevertheless, everyone in the industry still refers to them
as 'TC whatever' so I shall here. Apparently, it would appear
that he did not think that signs directing people to 'stage 5' or
'stage 6'
were confusing at all.
|
 |
|
The
back of the scenery block in 1954. This all looks very
different today. The protruding section of the building is the
scenic artists' studio or 'paint frame'. This is now completely
hidden by - you guessed it - offices, and satellite dishes now occupy
much of this area. Note the wonderful old cars! You
certainly can't park there any more. |
Stage
1
was the construction of the scenery block (officially called the
design block) which was completed in 1953. At the back of the
building a scenic artists studio was constructed enabling backcloths
to be painted. This extraordinary construction is 65ft from
basement floor to roof beams. A platform half way up the room
enabled the artists to paint massive cloths 30ft high and to reach
all the parts of the cloth simply by raising or lowering the
canvasses which passed through a slot between the platform and the
wall. When finished, the cloth could be rolled up and stored in
the basement or slid through a slot in the wall into the ground floor area.
This
space still remains, hidden behind a locked door, and is occasionally
rented out. There is a small dirty window between a staircase
and the platform area which I discovered early in 2006. A few
small flats were leaning against the wall but there was no sign of
any cloths having been painted recently. Large flexible tubes
now hang from the roof - one assumes to improve the ventilation and
draw the paint fumes out.
|
 |
 |
|
The
paint frame. This elevation drawing taken from the 'Architect
and Building News' shows the scale of the building. As you can
see - canvasses can be painted on all sides of the platform as they
slide up or down at the touch of a button. The control panel
for the hoist motors in the centre of the platform was affectionately
known as the 'Dalek.' |
On the
ground floor is an area originally used to manufacture and store
scenery. A carpentry and machine shop created the sets which
were then assembled in the setting space before being disassembled
and stacked on trucks to be towed round the scenery runway to the
studio. The scenery would then be brought back and taken down
in a huge lift to be stored in the basement or repainted and adapted
for use in another programme. In another part of the basement
was a large prop store where items for dressing sets were kept.
Props
are now stored in the area on the ground floor of the East Tower
building. The old prop store in the basement of the Design
Building has now been rebuilt as a climate-controlled secure
storeroom for what looks like orchestral scores (not that I've been
snooping about or anything) - the rest of the basement is being used
for general storage. Geoff Posner (for it is he) recalls that
the oddly named 'Movement Control' used to be on the ground floor of
the Design Block. He also recalls that the prop store...
'...had
thirteen artificial legs in the Artificial Legs section, not to say
M******t Q***t. Now M******t's job was simply to book the
musical instruments needed for all the shows in TC. Nothing
else. Needless to say she went home at 3.30 most days.'
I
probably ought to make it clear that such practices ended many, many
years ago! I have protected the lady's name to avoid any
possible embarrassment. No doubt her manager was fully aware
what time she went home. I'm sure the 1970s camera managers in
my department were equally aware that when a six-man camera crew was
scheduled to a studio with only four cameras, one or two of us
usually went home after the morning rig. I can imagine how this
reads to most people who thought that this was the sort of thing
confined to British Leyland - yes I am now just as appalled as you
are at what went on in those days but I wonder how many other British
companies turned a blind eye to similar practices.
Scenery
is currently stored in a large open-sided shelter that runs around
the outside of the ring road surrounding the main building.
Nowadays all scenery is made by private companies and nothing is
manufactured here any longer. The only scenery stored on site
is for shows whilst they have a regular booking in a studio.
Sets are destroyed when they are no longer needed, whereas before the
changes imposed in the 1990s, flats and other items would be saved if
they could be, repainted and used on many different programmes.
Thus, rather than 'the BBC' owning the scenery, it is now bought or
hired by each individual programme which naturally does not have the
budget to store it afterwards unless there is definitely going to be
another series of the same show. This was one of the many
changes brought in by John Birt.
Actually,
there is one exception to this. Paul Hayes has informed me
that the original Dr Who Tardis fell apart in the 1970s and
was replaced with another that was used until the final Sylvester
McCoy episode in 1989. Despite the official policy of not
storing scenery, this Tardis was never destroyed but over the years
was quietly moved from place to place and hidden around the
building. I suppose nobody could quite bring themselves to give
the order to load it onto a truck for disposal. After all, it
hardly takes up much room. (At least, on the outside.) Of
course, the new 2004 series was made in Wales with its own new
'machine' but the original (extremely tatty) Tardis was still on site
in 2005 and was used for a spoof opening to Jet Set on the day
in April when the new Dr Who was first transmitted. I
had the dubious honour of lighting this sequence. Spookily - I
also lit the same thing in 2006, with Eamonn Holmes exiting the
Tardis in the Blue Peter Garden on the day the next Dr Who
series began. Curiously, a while after this website revealed
the fact that it still existed, it was dug out of its hiding place,
the dust blown off it and for a couple of years was proudly displayed
outside the audience foyer entrance. (See below.) I'm not
claiming any credit for this but I'm certainly glad to see that
someone had the sense to make the best use of it.
It's
not there now of course. It has been replaced with a 'newer'
version. The original one's whereabouts are once again a
mystery. My spies tell me that it is safe 'as it belongs to the
BBC drama department'. Some mistake there, surely.
|
 |
A
familiar object to all.
I
think the furniture castors spoil the effect a bit, personally.
with
thanks to Ian Hillson |
The
photo below shows the interior of the scenery block. Adam Tandy
has written to let me know that he understood that the original Dr Who
production designer (Peter Brachacki) got the idea for the treatment
of the interior of the Tardis walls from this roof. I see what
he means. In fact, I think even the current 'Welsh' version has
an echo of it. (This unique design, incidentally, impressed
English Heritage so much that they recommended a grade 2 listing for
the building in 2008.)
|
 |
|
|
 |
The
ground floor of the scenery block. (Actually, technically the
first floor - as the basement that is accessed at the back of the
building is in fact the ground floor. Do you care? Neither do I.)
The
plan dates back to 1953. The photograph must have been taken
just after completion and just before the scenery moved in. The
photographer is standing by the 'G' of 'Paper and Painting' on the
plan drawing.
The
carpentry and machine shop is now occupied by the technical stores
and half the setting space is now the lighting store. This
moved from an area in Stage 5 in the early 1990s when scenery
construction was abandoned here.
|
For
the first thirty-five years of the Centre, above the scenery workshop
were the drawing rooms (no, not that sort of 'drawing room') and
offices where all the designers used to work It was very handy
for lighting directors, costume designers, producers and directors to
be able to pop over one of the bridges and meet them informally, look
at the plans, drawings and samples of materials to be used and
discuss the progress of the set design for a programme.
Nowadays this is is mostly done on the phone or via email which isn't
quite the same.
Geoff
Posner recalls 'the
track down the corridor of designers and their assistants with
numerous bottles of wine balanced precariously on the tilted drawing
boards...' amongst
many other happy memories of the good old bad old days.
As
soon as the building was complete it was used to construct scenery
which was then loaded onto lorries and transported to the studios in
Lime Grove, Television Theatre and Riverside Studios. The
offices were occupied by the team designing and constructing the main
block and the head of the television service was also based here.
|
In
1955, the same year that ITV was launched, the BBC held a glamorous
showbiz ball one afternoon in the main scene dock of the scenery
block of all places. This was technically, therefore, the first
television programme made at TV Centre. Hundreds of celebs were
invited and in fact those that weren't came anyway. No less
than 2,500 turned up and shuffled round the dance floor. Two
top bands played and the whole thing was televised by an OB
unit. (Sadly of course, this was live and no recording
exists.) The idea was partly to launch the new afternoon
service of BBCtv but also obviously to prove to this new upstart ITV
that the BBC still had the loyalty of all the top performers in the
country. However, some things never change. The celebs
were simply there for a bit of publicity and within a few weeks many
of them were appearing on ITV shows. |
The
design block now has no designers in it - nor is any scenery built in
it. It is now officially called the 'drama building' as
apparently it contains the offices of the drama department. I
guarantee that if you ask almost anybody working at TV Centre where
the drama building is they wouldn't have a clue. Ask where the
scenery block is and quite a few would certainly know where you mean.
Stage
2 followed
on straight away and was the building of the restaurant block.
This overlooked a small area of grass and shrubs that soon would
become the famous Blue Peter Garden.
The
building was completed in 1955 and at first was used as rehearsal
rooms and office space. It began its intended use as a
restaurant block in June 1960, with cafeteria-style seating on the
first and third floors and waitress service on the second floor.
The kitchens are on the ground floor and connect with the main block
via a tunnel and lifts, enabling food to be brought on trollies to
the sixth floor hospitality suite. They thought of everything!
The
waitress service floor closed in the mid-nineties, the top cafeteria
reduced in size and some of the block has now reverted to office
space as eating in the 'BBC canteen' is far less popular than it used
to be. (Countless references to the canteen in comedy
shows over the years probably didn't help.) In fact, so much so
that late in 2008 it closed at weekends. Food is now also
available via bars and delis spread around the building - but at
weekends when all the office staff have gone home and the only people
there are actually making programmes there is only one tea bar open
for some of the time.
Incidentally
- in November 2006, the old 2nd floor restaurant (what used to be
called the 'waitress service') was turned into a huge hairdressing
salon studio with hidden cameras for BBC Three's Celebrity Scissorhands
- a live reality show that somehow raised money for Children in
Need. Apparently the 'celebrity' trainees were: 'Eighties
pop icon, Steve Strange; winner of The Apprentice, Michelle
Dewberry; Radio 1 DJ, Scott Mills;
actress
and Dynasty star, Emma Samms; Right Said Fred frontman Richard
Fairbrass; TV presenter Sarah Cawood; singer Rowetta
(Happy Mondays, X Factor); actor and TV presenter Ortis Deeley
(Kidulthood, Live and Kicking); and TV personality Darren Day'
it says here. I'm afraid I missed it.
Geoff
Posner suggested a very sensible use for part of this building in
2007. As a seasoned producer/director of many comedies over the
years - and still very much at it - he pointed out how hard it is to
find rehearsal space these days. The old BBC rehearsal rooms in
Acton are no more so sitcoms mostly use draughty, cold and smelly
church halls around London. He suggested turning a floor in
this building back into a rehearsal room for the next few years until
the BBC decide what they are going to do with it. Blow me down,
but that's exactly what has happened, and some BBC Comedy shows do
now use the old 'Waitress Service' floor to rehearse sketch shows and
sitcoms. Glory Be!
(More
on the rehearsal room saga a little below. Be patient!)
|
 |
|
The
first floor canteen in 1960 with the waitress service restaurant
overlooking it. Possibly the idea was that those who could
afford to eat there could literally look down on those who
couldn't. The balcony has now been blocked off. |
|
Around
2001/2 plans were drawn up to convert the lower two floors into
studios and continuity areas dedicated to the children's
department. These designs reached quite an advanced stage but
many problems were being encountered - in particular with lighting
and air conditioning. The head of Children's Department wanted
the studios to open out into the Blue Peter garden with huge windows
and doors overlooking it. He wanted to be able to shoot from
inside looking out and outside looking in - even in high summer.
The plan was that presenters should be able to begin talking to
camera indoors and wander outdoors or vice versa on the same
hand-held shot. There was even to be a glazed conservatory
area. The problem was that this area faces south so coping with
sunlight would have been something of an issue to say the least.
(This
had been achieved to an extent in TC9 which occupies part of this
area but the door is relatively small, does not face south and there
are no windows so we never see indoors to the studio whilst a
presenter is outdoors. If they walk from one area to the other
the camera is 'racked' the several stops necessary to cope with the
different light level.)
I
was asked to comment on the plans at one point and invited to oversee
the project from the lighting point of view but I made some excuse
and declined taking on this responsibility. Frankly, I thought
it would have been hugely problematic operationally and a
considerable frustration to the programme makers. It would have
been a massive undertaking - the studios would have had to be lit to
an incredibly bright level to compensate for the daylight. At
the same time, the producers apparently wanted to preserve the
colourful mood and atmosphere of typical kids programmes, in
particular X-change - the
daily magazine programme which was coming from the nicely controlled
environment of TC2 around that time. Indeed, the set of X-change
included plywood pillars that would match the real ones in the new
studio, anticipating a move within a few months. (A move that
kept being postponed.)
Another
issue was the changing nature of daylight in the late afternoon when
childrens programmes are on. You might start a show with the
studio lit to the same level as the outside but by the time you were
off the air it would be dark outside. These conflicting
requirements and 'technical' issues were not, it seems, understood by
those who were keen to see the studio built. Apparently, the
problems 'were being exaggerated by technicians who were stuck in the
old ways of doing things and did not understand the new blue-sky thinking.'
One
idea mooted by the production types as a solution was to have one
bright half of the main studio matching the daylight somehow divided
from a darker 'moody' half, but how you went from one to the other
was never resolved. Meanwhile, the size and cost of the new
studio's ventilation plant continued rising. As it happened,
whilst decisions on the project were nearing a crisis the head of
CBBC moved on to greater things as controller of ITV1 and the whole
idea was quietly dropped.
A
further irony is that by the end of 2006, the whole idea of in-vision
presenters linking children's TV had gone out of fashion. TC9
is no longer in use. The programme X-change which drove
all these plans is also no more.
|
Before
leaving stage 2, I should mention a small studio that was
established there in 1996.
TC9
was created in a single storey building overlooking the Blue Peter
Garden. This area, extending from the restaurant block, was
originally designed as a 'foyer lounge' - hence the glass brick
wall. It probably never had this use, being used initially as a
builders' canteen, then becoming a store for the make-up
department. This department was closed in 1995 and the studio
was subsequently created to be used by the Children's department for
continuity links and other short programmes.
TC9
is an irregular shape, about 30 x 30ft average dimensions with a
very low grid. It also has a corridor and small seating area
which can be used for interviews. It was fitted with Thomson
1647 sportcams which had been in use in Pres A for a year or so.
These could have the head separated from most of the electronics by
an umbilical cable so that a very small camera was actually carried
by the cameraman, enabling a great deal of movement.
This
freedom from fixed shots was seen as very exciting by the young
directors of the links transmitted live from here, who often could
not understand why this introduced lighting problems. Since the
LD was also the console operator and had only one electrician for
assistance, relighting between sequences could be very exciting to
say the least. Because of the way the links were shot, quite
substantial relights were usually necessary. It has to be said
that not every sequence that went out from this studio over the years
demonstrated perfect portraiture and subtle balance of foreground and
background from the lighting point of view. In fact, on
occasions the fact that the presenter had any light on them at all
was something of a miracle. And I speak from some experience.
In
2004 the studio ceased linking children's programmes on the main
broadcast channels and became the continuity studio just for the CBBC
channel. From late 2006 it was decided that links between
children's programmes would be much shorter - often with no presenter
in vision and the studio would no longer be required.
TC9
was still under a 'service level agreement' between BBC Studios and
the Children's department so it could not be used for general
programming. It remained empty for about nine months but in
September 2007 it became the home of two regular programmes - TMi,
the Saturday morning show that had previously come from MTV's studio
in Leicester Square, and SMart. (Yes, that really is how
it's spelt.) The latter programme was presented by Kirsten
O'Brien, who in a way returned home as she was for a long while one
of the regular CBBC continuity presenters.
The
studio was mothballed once again in Jan 2008 as the cameras had
become old and unreliable but it was brought back into use again in
the autumn and again in 2009 for further series of TMi, using
TC2's old Thomson cameras.
The
studio is likely to be 'owned' by Children's department until they
move to Salford in 2011.
|
 |
The
site in 1957. The scenery block and restaurant blocks are
complete and the foundations are being laid for the main block.
The ground slab for TC1 is the only visible studio. |
Stage
3 involved
the most complex construction and took four years before the Centre
became operational. It consisted of the main circular building
and the completion of studios 1 - 7. Four studios would
initially be brought into service within the first few months - 2, 3,
4 and 5. The design of these was based on experience gained
from working at Lime Grove and in particular Riverside, where various
experiments involving gallery layout and lighting systems were tried
out. The Centre officially opened with TC3 operational on 29th
June 1960. TC4, 5 and 2 opened over the following few
months. The shells of TC1, TC6 and TC7 were constructed
around the same time but they were not fitted out until a few years later.
|
 |
|
Arthur
Askey - diminutive and popular entertainer of the '50s and '60s -
standing in the newly completed TC3. The studio was considered
'massive' at the time and of course, compared with those at Riverside
and Lime Grove, it was.
Incidentally,
the large window slightly protruding into the studio on top left of
the picure is the viewing gallery. Every studio has one of
these (even control room suites did originally.) The idea was
that visitors could be brought round to see 'their' BBC in action
without disturbing what was going on.
This
still goes on believe it or not. More than once I have been
standing in the middle of an empty studio set waiting for the sparks
to return from lunch whilst picking my nose and scratching my balls -
only to idly look up and focus on a window with 20 bemused members of
the Women's Institute gazing down at me. |
TC2
and TC5 are both 60 x 40 metric feet within firelanes and TC3 and TC4
are about 70 x 90 metric feet within firelanes.
TC2
soon became the home of the new wave of satirical comedy shows such
as That Was the Week That Was. TC5 was the home of
schools broadcasting and according to a 1970 BBC booklet 'adjacent to
studio 5 is an area specially designed and serviced for schools
programmes.' I must admit I can't think to what this might be
referring, unless the area originally intended as the puppet studio
became taken over as some sort of preparation area. Other
programmes such as panel game shows were also made here but for
various reasons, most likely because no schools could afford colour
televisions in the early 1970s, TC5 was converted to colour long
after the other studios - probably in 1973.
Of the
larger two original studios, TC3 was earmarked as a drama studio and
TC4 for light entertainment. The difference was in the acoustic
treatment of the walls - TC3 had a shorter reverberation period so
was more suited to speech. I have to say that I have never been
aware of this - having worked on many occasions in both studios so
possibly any acoustic difference was altered in later years.
(Both studios now in any case have new acoustic wall panels following
the removal of asbestos - TC4 in 1988 and TC3 in 2007.) Anyway,
during the early years at least, TC3 was the preferred studio for drama.
TC4
also had a variable acoustic system involving microphones and
speakers around the roof and walls. This was called
'ambiophony'. The system is said to have worked quite well, but
according to a sound supervisor of the time it had the disadvantage
that the delays to the different speakers would only be correct for
one position within the orchestra. That (and probably the
scarcity of such programmes) meant that it fell into disuse. It
was soon overtaken by artificial electronic reverberation systems,
although interestingly, a similar system was included in Limehouse
studio1 when that was built in 1982.
|
 |
|
This
was the inlay desk in TC4. Captain Mainwaring at the
controls. The picture is dated January 1961. Now you
don't see sports jackets like that very much these days - more's the
pity, I'd say.
The
desk was placed in the production gallery. All the BBC's main
studios had one of these. They enabled clever wipes to be used
or an early form of overlay using a luminance key. The device
seen to the right of the operator here is a camera looking down at an
illuminated screen. You could place a piece of black card in
the shape of, say, a flower and that could be used as a key for an
effect in a dance routine. All kinds of wipes were tried
out. A particularly messy one was to cover the screen with
tealeaves and blow them off on cue. You couldn't do that one
again in a hurry.
Later,
as the studios were colourised the inlay desks became more
sophisticated to include up to three layers of CSO (colour separation
overlay). DVEs (digital video effects) were added as soon as
they became available in the 1980s. The BBC research department
came up with an early version but this was soon superceded by boxes
manufactured by companies like Quantel. Top of the Pops
usually tried these devices out first but within a few months every
show was plagued with zooming, flipping and tumbling pictures for no
good reason.
Nowadays
wipes and overlay tricks are done by the studio's vision mixer
(switcher) but extra boxes of tricks like DVEs are brought in and
plugged up as and when required. Most complex video trickery is
now done in post production rather than in the studio at the time of
recording. Sadly. there's no place any more for the 'blowing
the tealeaves across the screen' wipe.
|
TC3
and 4 were both originally equipped with black and white cameras but
the Centre had been planned with colour in mind. These two
studios were re-equipped in 1969 and 1970 respectively with EMI 2001
colour cameras. Both studios now have very swish gallery
suites, TC3 looks very smart with its new black studio wall panels
and TC4 was fully equipped for high definition in the summer of 2008.
Back
in 1960 the original camera choice was interesting. No doubt in
a desire to support both major British camera manufacturers, half the
studios - TC2, 3 and 7 - were equipped with Marconi MkIV cameras and
the other half - TC1, 4 and 5 with EMI 201 cameras.
I have
been given an interesting recollection by a cameraman of the
period. He informs me that the EMI lens turret was designed for
5 lenses (although only four were fitted) and apparently was slower
in changing lenses than the Marconi - particularly when going between
the ones that involved crossing the blank plate. Apparently,
for LE this was seldom an issue but for drama it could be
crucial. In a scene with two cameras taking over-shoulder
2-shots until the crucial dramatic moment when a close-up was called
for, there might only be one second when the vision mixer cut to the
other camera for the reaction shot before cutting back for the
close-up. If the turret was still turning then the cut would be
forced to be late. There was at least one drama director of the
day who allegedly refused to work in the studio with the slower
turret because it compromised his shooting style. His plays or
episodes of drama series had upwards of 500 shots in half an hour.
|
 |
The
EMI 203 four and a half inch image-orthicon black and white
camera. These were installed in TC1, TC4 and TC5. Most
were fitted with turret lenses as shown but some had early zoom
lenses. It wasn't until colour cameras came along in 1967 that
every camera was fitted with a zoom lens.
(Thanks
to Bernie Newnham for the image - for it is he - and a fine looking
corduroy jacket it is too.) |
Studios
3 and 4 are almost mirror images of each other although oddly, TC4
is actually 1 foot wider than TC3 at 71 metric feet within
firelanes. This may be because the walls of TC3 are thicker in
order to keep out the noise of the Hammersmith and City railway line.
The
studios were equipped with the same design of long lighting bars as
had been tried out in Riverside. Each was initially fitted with
two 2kW fresnel lanterns and two multi-bulbed fill lights although
this was adapted for each production. The lighting bars also at
first had a parallel bar hanging a few feet beneath although quite
how these were intended to be used remains a mystery! The bars
were spaced the same as in Riverside - 2 feet from end to end and six
feet apart. This wide spacing has frequently caused many a
headache to lighting directors! Although the bars were replaced
with a new design in the 1980s the wide separation remained the
same. (In monopole studios like Teddington or TLS the tracks
are only 18 inches or 2 feet apart which enables lights to be
positioned much closer to where the LD needs them to be.)
|
 |
|
Above
is the original lighting installation in TC4. The rest
of the first batch of studios were fitted with the same long
bars. The lamps were simply hung on the bar rather than on
rolling 'trolleys' and pantographs as they are today. Of
course, this is before the standard rig of two dual-source fixtures
per bar was adopted.
Below
is TC3 rigged for a typical gameshow in 2005. We have almost
gone full circle as hardly a single dual-source lantern is to be
seen. Nearly all have been derigged for this show (In It To
Win It) which is lit almost entirely with automated lights. |
|
 |
These
new studios adopted the dimming and lighting control systems that had
been tried out at Riverside - Strand C-type consoles connected to
variable resistor and auto-transformer dimmers, remotely controlled
by an electro-magnetic clutch system. The heat generated by
hundreds of these dimmers must have been phenomenal.
Apparently, TV Centre was the first place to adopt normal mains
voltage in the studios. Previously a voltage of 130 volts
(why?) had been used. The BBC were also terribly proud of the
fact that the lights in these new studios were 'remote controlled.'
For
someone who has become used to using automated lights like Vari*lites
and Macs on various entertainment shows I found this claim somewhat
surprising until I eventually found out what they meant. It
seems that these were the first BBC studios equipped with luminaires
that had attachments enabling an electrician to adjust pan, tilt, and
spot and flood using a pole. Previously, every lamp had been
adjusted by an electrician working off a set of ladders. I
would hardly describe this as 'remote control' but seriously, this
was a significant advance. I can work with an experienced pole
operator to set 100 lamps and be finished in two or three hours.
To do this using ladders would probably triple this time if not more.
|
 |
This
picture shows a 'lighting supervisor' operating a Strand type C
console. (On Sundays he played the church organ.) The
white diagram on the wall is the geographic mimic which indicates to
the operator which luminaires in the studio are lit. Small
bulbs are fed directly from the dimmers and glow in proportional
brightness depending on the dimmer level.
All
the studios were fitted with one of these mimics but only TC1 still
has one. The other studios now have a VDU fed from the console,
not the dimmers, that is nothing like as clear to read. It must
have cost a fortune to connect around 1000 tiny lightbulbs for the
mimic in TC1 - one to each dimmer.
Judging
by the shape of the plan - this must be TC3. |
One
great advantage all the studios at TVC have over London's other TV
studios is in the provision of motorised
scenery hoists. In monopole studios a few motorised
hoists are sometimes available but these have to be carried into
position and placed where needed in the grid. Most scenery is
therefore supported using hemp ropes and hauled up by hand. At
TV Centre this is hardly ever necessary. Every studio has
dozens of scene hoists that can be tracked into position and raised
or lowered at the push of a button. The hook is attached to a
steel line that is fixed to the flattage or ceiling piece that needs
to be supported. This makes scene setting here much
quicker, simpler and probably safer - and arguably gives designers
more flexibility with their sets. In TC3 and 4 each
hoist was initially only trackable within a span
of about 10 feet but during
the major refurbs of the 1980s more were installed and they can now
track across the whole studio between the lighting bars. This
improved system was originally installed in TC1, 6 and 8. TC1
has even more hoists, some capable of supporting immense loads.
During
the '60s, '70s and '80s, the Centre contained some extraordinary
facilities, many of which most people working there probably had no
idea existed. For example - Tim Dorney, engineer in News dept,
has written to inform me that during the 1970s he discoved that there
was a room at the base of the South Hall where grand pianos were
stored. The door was never locked and he tells me that he
passed many a lunch hour practising on one of several beautiful
instruments, all of which were always in perfect tune.
Videotape
and Telerecording
The
Centre was designed with the basement or 'hub' being set aside for
the new technology of videotape recording. The BBC called it
'VT' - everybody else called it 'VTR'. (When giving a cue for a pre-recorded
insert, BBC directors learnt to say 'run VT' - meanwhile, ITV
directors said 'roll VTR'. I've no idea why the difference.)
By
placing the VT department in the hub, the cable runs to each studio
were kept as short as possible. (Mind you, programmes at
Television Theatre, half a mile down the road, were also recorded
here in later years. Indeed, when all the machines here were
busy, some shows were recorded at TVI, five miles away in Soho, so
long cable runs were perhaps not quite as crucial as was originally
thought. Try telling that to home cinema geeks who think a
£100 ten-metre scart lead can't possibly provide acceptable
pictures. One hi-fi shop once actually refused to sell me one
for that reason! Anyway...)
The
2-inch 'quad' Ampex machines were very much new technology and were
phenomenally expensive to buy. In 1960 the BBC was paying
around £30,000 per machine. Bear in mind that around that
time the cost of the average house was only £3,000. By
comparison, in November 2008 an average house cost
£224,000. That would put the price of a VT machine today
at £2.24m! You can actually pick up a reconditioned second
hand one today for about £20,000. (I can't find a 'new'
price on the internet.)
Tape
too was horrendously costly - around £120 per hour.
Another quick search of the internet will find today's popular format
of Digital Betacam available at less than £12 for one hour's
recording. Then take into account inflation over the past 50
years and the difference in price is obvious. That's why so many '60s
and '70s programmes were wiped and the tape used again.
Apparently,
the videotape area in the basement was not ready when TC3 opened and
a couple of machines were installed temporarily in the shell of Pres
B. Even when complete there were initially only four, then
seven more videotape recorders in the basement for the first few years.
By
comparison, these days each studio has its own VT machines -
sometimes as many as eight or more may be in use to record the main
output of the studio, a back-up copy and a number of 'iso'
recordings. These are isolated feeds of individual cameras,
enabling the programme to be edited more slickly at a later
date. The Post Production area in Stage 5 now of course has
well over a hundred more machines. It seems astonishing that
for the first few years the whole of TV Centre had only eleven VTRs
in total for recording and editing programmes. Even by 1970
there were only 16 VT booths - which was the maximum allowed for in
the original design of the area.
Of
course, many programmes were recorded - but not necessarily on
tape. Beneath TC6 was a large area set aside for the
telerecording department. Telerecording on film was a
well-established means of saving programmes for archive purposes or
for export. When the Centre opened, most film telerecording was
still carried out down the road at Lime Grove. Garth Nicholson
wrote to me in December 2008 with more info - and a comment on an
astonishing recording of Dad's Army
that had its colour restored from an original black and white film recording...
|
'As with
telecine operators we originally had one or two working machines in
TV Centre and these were initially staffed as an outpost of Lime
Grove depending on our workload. Finally the 16mm facilities
became fully operational to be followed by the 35mm machines at TV
Centre so we all decamped to TV Centre.
We worked
there for some years (a quick recall would say right up to the early
'70s) but of course apart from selling 16mm recordings overseas and
finally back-up work for videotape the days of the somewhat crude
technique of film recording were numbered.
As a matter of
interest we did carry out some colour experimental work where we
produced 3 negatives (R,G & B) using 3 separate passes on the
same machine. These were sent away to the processing laboratory for
combining using the Technicolor process but we were fighting a losing
battle against the colour VTR machine.
When I saw
yesterday's rebroadcast of a 16mm Dad's Army from which they
have recovered colour information I was totally amazed.
Remember in the early VTR days it was never thought that they would
be accurate enough to even run colour and as for editing then it took
several hours to make an acceptable cut between two takes which had
to be done by going down to black at the end and the beginning of the
edit. How things move on!'
|
It
is perhaps worth pointing out that programmes recorded on film were
of poor quality compared with the live picture. Most engineers
considered that the pictures, particularly in the early years, were
barely broadcast quality. From 1946 to the mid '50s the BBC did
not transmit telerecorded programmes unless they absolutely had
to. Even a play with a repeat broadcast later in the week was
perfomed live again. The reason we have those old BBC
telerecordings is that the programmes were exported in that form to
Commonwealth countries like Australia, Canada, New Zealand and South Africa.
Research
into improving the quality of the image did produce some results as
the years went by and by the mid '50s more programmes were being
recorded and transmitted on film. In fact, according to BBC
handbooks - in 1959 the BBC telerecorded 1,300 programmes and
re-transmitted 600. In other words, more were archived for
possible export but 600 is still quite a sizeable number of TV
programmes (on only one channel, don't forget) that were recorded on
film for later transmission.
The
telerecording area under TC6 became the BBC's very well-used and
highly respected research library during the 1970s. This
provided invaluable support to all kinds of programmes for the next
two decades. In the mid 1990s under the new Thatcherite/Birtian
commercial way of working it was declared unable to 'pay its way' (Heaven
help us from small-minded accountants!!!) so it was closed.
It even made the national papers when someone leaked that the record
library was having to charge more to lend a disc to a production for
an hour or two than for them to buy a new copy. The area is now
a videotape archive.
When
the VT department moved to Stage 5 in 1992 the hub area of the
basement was transformed into open-plan offices with a huge glass
roof. Goodness knows how much that must have cost. This
became the HQ for 'TSPR' - the original trading name with ancient
Roman imperial overtones, for the newly commercial BBC Studios
business. Latin scholars are invited here to come up with a
suitable acronym. (It actually stood for Television Studios
Production Resources - how boring is that?)
I
have hardly done the VT and telerecording departments justice
here. For much more information and many old photos I recommend
visiting the ex-BBC VT engineers' website on www.vtoldboys.com.
The
presentation area
As
well as the main studios there were several other smaller areas
completed at this time. On the fourth floor in the central
wedge between TC3 and TC4 was the main network control area for what
was then called BBCtv and the planned second channel. A
corridor led from the lifts towards the back of the building and on
either side were the control rooms, apparatus rooms, voice-over
booths and from 1963 a small room containing the 'noddy' camera that
could be remotely tilted up to look at the revolving globe logo and
down to look at a clock.
Incidentally,
perhaps not surprisingly, there was also a 'Big Ears' - a twin
magazine caption scanner.
|
 |
The
noddy camera for BBC2. The graphics are from the black and
white years so the photo must have been taken some time between 1964
and 1967. (Thanks to Gareth Dubai for pointing this out.)
Note
the beautifully finished woodwork! These days (if such things
existed) it would be made of MDF with a lick of black paint if you
were lucky. |
At
the end of the corridor was another control room on each side that
looked into a pair of studios, side by side. These were
presentation studios and were known by all as Pres A and Pres B.
They had been designed for continuity announcers such as Michael
Aspel, Kenneth Kendall, Judith Chalmers and Nan Winton but within a
few years the BBC decided to adopt out-of-vision announcers.
Thus the studios became available for other uses. They were
quite small - at 32 x 22 metric feet wall to wall with a firelane
crossing the middle. This could never be obstructed! It's
not quite clear when in-vision announcements ended but there was a
new intake including Meryl O'Keefe in 1963.
Pres
A was the first to open in 1960 - Pres B opened in about 1963/4 with
EMI 201 vidicon cameras. It was then converted to colour in
1966 and became the home of Late Night Line-Up - a daily
arts and topical discussion programme. This studio thus became
the home of the BBC's colour camera tests. It is likely that
the tests in studio H at Lime Grove ended around this time.
The
colour camera tests in 1966 initially involved three Peto-Scott
(Philips) PC60s. These were the cameras that had been chosen to
equip the BBC's first colour OB units. Later, a three-way test
was undertaken using a prototype EMI 2001 (then called the 2000), a
Marconi MkVII and a Peto-Scott PC60. In order that the tests
were fair, two of the cameras had a cue dot superimposed in the top
left or right of the frame. These were changed every night so
the engineers watching at home did not know which camera was
which. They recorded their opinions and the results were later compiled.
This
story has been confirmed to me as being accurate by an engineer who
was involved and by the studio director who worked on the experiments
at the time. He later went on to direct the first colour shows
in TC6 - themselves still very much an experiment.
The
camera chosen to equip TC6 and TC8 in 1967 was the Marconi
MkVII. The reason for this choice is arguable and is discussed
later on this web page. (See 'A
Potted History of early colour cameras.')
Pres
A was converted to colour in 1968 (with Marconi Mk VIIs) and became
the weather studio. Between forecasts it was used to make
trailers involving captions and slides with a voice-over actor in a
nearby sound booth. VT clips were played in and the people in
the presentation department who made these trails became adept at
producing very slick and professional-looking 'ads' for BBC
programmes. This was one thing ITV took many years to get
right. The ITV companies did not have an equivalent department
or dedicated staff so their trails were much simpler - often nothing
more than a caption voiced over by the continuity presenter.
|
 |
The
presentation area in the central wedge on the fourth floor in
1960. None of this exists today. As can be seen, the
rooms on the left were opened first, those on the right were for the
planned second channel. Pres A is the room top left, Pres B on
the right. All the cueing and cutting from one programme to the
next was done in the network control room on this floor.
Before
the days of computers it was possible for the network producer to be
quite creative in the way they went from one show to the next.
For instance, there was one individual who liked to do a slow mix
from the BBC1 globe into the star field at the beginning of Star Trek.
Raphael Szynowski has written to me to let me know that the creative
person in question was called Ken Laing. Or at least, he told
Raphael that he was.
Although
the BBC soon went to out-of-vision announcers they did restore them
for children's TV in the 1980s. The tiny area used for this
became known as the 'broom cupboard'. After the great storm of
October 1987 all power to TV Centre was lost except for the emergency
generator that supplied this area. Therefore, BBC1 was kept on
air with the news coming from the broom cupboard - a very serious
looking newsreader backed by a brightly painted wall and the remains
of children's paintings that had been sent in to Philip Schofield and
his puppet Gordon the gopher.
The
exact location of the broom cupboard has been pointed out to me by
Ian Trill, ace vision mixer and now director who used to work in Pres
during the 1980s. He has reminded me that the network control
rooms were moved to the areas at the bottom of the plan below,
previously occupied by the sub control and international
control. The right hand room was for BBC1 and the area to its
right was walled in to create the room where the voice-over
continuity announcer sat. There was a window between him and
the main control room. The announcer had a small mixer in front
of him so that he could cut up captions etc as he spoke. It was
this tiny room that had a camera bolted onto the wall so that the
Children's TV continuity announcers could be seen in vision. |
|
 |
|
The
Pres area a few years later when both studios and all control suites
were operational. Click
on the image to see it in higher resolution. The control rooms
and other areas were moved about and reconfigured several times
during the life of this vital part of the BBC.
Now
this area is completely unrecognisable. Note the thickness of
the wall dividing the studios. Even this has been removed. |
One
of the trickiest jobs as a young and inexperienced cameraman was
doing the 'weather pan'. One camera had a locked-off shot
looking at the Atlantic chart. The weather man - Jack Scott,
Michael Fish, Ian McCaskill etc. - then moved to a smaller chart
showing today's weather. This was being framed by another
camera. At some point he would take
three or four paces right
to the next chart showing tonight's weather. Since there was no
script and it was unrehearsed you had to take your own cue when to
pan. It sounds simple but was highly nerve-racking as there
were many false moves as he might take a pace camera-right and
stretch across the chart to indicate East Anglia or the weather in
the North Sea. Some individuals would move very briskly and if
you were not careful he would leave you behind. Of course, if
you incorrectly started to pan too soon then you either had to
continue and leave him behind or stop and pan back in a rather
pathetic manner. This, of course, is when he would notice that
you had begun the move and as you panned back to the left he would
leave the frame on the right. You can imagine the various
cock-ups possible on this, the simplest of camera moves.
At some point they all must have happened although never of course
by me. No really. Honestly.
|
 |
Jack
Scott in front of the Atlantic chart. The charts were made of
painted steel so that the magnetic symbols would stick to them.
(Sometimes, of course, they fell off.) The isobars on the
Atlantic chart were specially made by The Magnetic Rubber Company of
Sheffield. I kid you not. They also manufactured the
rubberised strips used to seal fridge doors. Now there's a fact
to impress your friends at parties.
With
thanks to Geoff Hawkes and the tech-ops website. |
According
to a couple of sources, the floor of Pres B was used to house the
first VT machines at the Centre when it opened in 1960.
Apparently, the videotape area was not ready to accept them. By
the time Pres B opened around 1964 the machines had long departed for
the basement.
Pres
B was used for a variety of simple shows over the years including The
Sky at Night, Points of View and Barry Norman's Film
'72 (and onwards) series. In fact, David Scott-Cowan
has written to me to point out that a separate programme department
was created to devise programmes that would fit into this tiny
studio. It was based in the 'temporary' wooden building -
originally the builders' site offices - that sat in front of TVC
along Wood Lane during the '60s, '70s and '80s. The programmes
included The Book Programme with Robert Robinson and Did
You See? with Ludovic Kennedy.
As
mentioned above, around 1968 these studios were equipped with three
Marconi Mk VII colour cameras each, which had previously been in use
for a few months in TC6. These were very, very long.
About five feet long in fact. Add a cameraman standing behind
each one and there wasn't much studio left. All the more
astonishing then that Pres B was the original home of the Old Grey
Whistle Test. It began in 1971 and occupied the studio one
night a week instead of Late Night Line-Up. If you ever
wondered why they used bare studio walls as a set and the cameras
never moved then just picture the scene: A live band plus three
enormous cameras squeezed into a space about the size of someone's
living room. It's a wonder there was space for whispering Bob
Harris on his stool in the corner.
In
the early '90s the weather moved to a purpose-built suite containing
several studios elsewhere in TV Centre. Pres A was then taken
over by CBBC and used as a continuity studio - its original
purpose. In 1995 the BBC1 and BBC2 transmission suites moved
two floors down to the old telecine area following that department's
move to the post-production area in stage 5. The old control
rooms on the fourth floor were converted into continuity suites for
the BBC's new digital channels.
Once
Studio 9 was opened next to the Blue Peter Garden around 1996, Pres
A was closed. It seems very likely that Pres B also closed
towards the end of 1996. Alan Brett has written to me. He
works for a hospital TV studio and informs me that he was invited to
go and help himself to anything useful from the old network control
rooms. Whilst there he looked in the Pres studios and on the
wall was a setting plan for Barry Norman's Film '96. It
was dated 18th November 1996. My guess is that this was the
last programme made in the studio - unless, of course, you know different!
The
network control for the two main channels moved down to the second
floor, occupying the area previously home to telecine. The old
studio control rooms and associated areas were later converted into
new digital continuity areas for BBC1 and BBC2. Pres A and B
remained as empty shells until 1999, when they were rebuilt with a
mezzanine floor and converted into more transmission suites and
technical areas, coming into service in 2000.
However,
even this is no more and early in 2005 the whole playout department
for all the BBC and UKTV channels moved to a highly secure and
sophisticated purpose-built area in the new media village at White
City, just down Wood Lane. That operation is no longer run by
the BBC but by a private company - 'Red Bee' - which was formed in
late 2005.
As
far as I know, this suite of rooms was unoccupied throughout 2006 and
into 2007. In Jan 2007 I explored the area and found that it
had been completely transformed from the way the old control rooms
and studios were originally laid out. Even the wall dividing
the two studios had been demolished - with only a couple of pillars
remaining. That must have been quite a job. There are now
a number of rooms - one or two quite large - with smart carpet,
glazed partitions and hardwood doors. The only clue as to what
used to be there is the area up the new stairs at the back onto the
mezzanine floor that was built within the space occupied by the two
studios. Although this is now an empty office with suspended
ceiling and carpeted floor, the shape and size of the old Pres
studios can still be made out. They seem very small.
As
mentioned above, during the late '90s the transmission suites for
BBC1 and BBC2 were situated two floors down from their original
location. Matt Phelps has written to me about his memories of
this period...
'It
was a 2 person suite - the Network Director and the Announcer, who
sat in a glass booth off the left of this suite facing back towards
you. The big green digital countdown in the middle of the stack
was the 'weather counter' which was fired from this position and
could also be seen in the 'self op' weather studio. If it went
wrong, or you forgot to set it before a weather report, it usually
sent the weather people into a fury! This
room always stank of diesel fumes - especially in the Continuity
booths - for reason that we never quite got to the bottom of during
my 6 years there!'
|
 |
|
Network
control for BBC1 in 1998. Sue Barker, reporting from
Wimbledon, can be seen on the preview monitor. The green
'weather counter' can be seen to the right of the clock. The
large handle on the right of the mixer is a fade-to-black
control. This was apparently known by all as the 'f**k fader'
since its use by the Network Director would only be in dire
circumstances and usually accompanied by that expletive.
With
thanks to Matt Phelps. |
TC4A
and the puppet studio
The
main phase of construction of TV Centre also included a couple of
other interesting areas. In the corner of TC4 was a soundproof
door leading to a studio about 20 feet square called TC4A. It
had no equipment of its own but did have wall boxes with sound
sockets connected to TC4's mixer. It was intended as a small
band room and was occasionally used for this purpose in the early
years. It could also be used as a stand-alone studio for simple
single-camera interviews but although it was soundproofed it had no
fixed production lighting facilities. When the studio was last
refurbished it was reduced in size and converted into a kitchen and
food prep area for TC4.
Through
a door in the opposite corner of TC4 was another small wedge-shaped
studio - although somewhat larger than TC4A and quite a bit
higher. This was the puppet studio and it had connecting doors
to the studios either side so cameras could be wheeled in to make
recordings. It had no sound or vision facilities of its
own. It did have a simple scaffold grid with lamps on
pantographs but how they were controlled I have no idea. It was
intended to replace the old puppet theatre tin shed in the yard at
the back of Lime Grove but was only used for a few years.
|
 |
This
picture shows Gordon Murray and assistants in the new TVC puppet
studio, making an episode of Rubovian
Legends
named Bees
and Bellows.
It was filmed somewhere around the beginning of 1962, although it
was not transmitted until October of that year.
Roy
Skelton was one of the voice-over artists. He later went on to
become the voice of Zippy and George in Thames TV's Rainbow
and, most impressively, the voice of the Daleks!
with
thanks to Alastair Roxburgh and www.rubovia.org
|
Gordon
Murray was the head of the BBC's Children's department and also
produced their puppet programmes but by the time the new studio was
opened he was beginning to become somewhat disillusioned. He
apparently didn't think the BBC really appreciated what he was doing
for them. He probably made around fifteen Rubovian Legends
programmes in the new TVC studio.
He
was keen to move on from this method of filming as he was also
becoming frustrated by the limitations of using puppets with
strings. He produced a pilot called The Minute Men (minute
men - geddit?) using stop frame techniques rather than strings but
his bosses in the BBC were not impressed. Other short films met
a similar reaction. Rather depressed at this, he left the BBC
in 1964 and set up his own studio in Albert Mansions, near the Albert
Hall. The Children's Department was closed at his departure and
the puppet studio was never used for this purpose again.
Two
years later Gordon Murray went on to have huge success with his own
company making Camberwick
Green and then Trumpton.
One assumes that the senior manager who had driven him from the BBC
did the decent thing and shut himself in a locked room with a loaded
revolver. Well - somehow I doubt it.
Meanwhile,
Peter Firmin and Oliver Postgate created Smallfims and sold such
classics to the BBC as The Clangers and Noggin the Nog.
The days of stringed puppets seemed to be over. Well, at the
BBC they were. Sylvia and Gerry Anderson of course had other
ideas and kept the technique alive - ultimately producing such
'Supermarionation' classics as Stingray, Thunderbirds and Captain
Scarlet at their APF studios in Slough for ATV.
As
mentioned above, the puppet studio probably became assigned to the
schools television department around 1964 although what they used it
for is not yet known. (Can you help???) TC5 was
the home of schools broadcasting and the puppet studio had good
access via a large door to this studio as well as TC4.
Around
1983 this little studio became the video effects workshop where post
production work was done on shows like Dr Who and various
other dramas using BBC-developed multi-level overlay and early
digital video processors. In the workshop there was space for a
camera and a small blue screen as well as VT machines and a complex
video mixing desk with loads of bolt-on toys. However - its
creation had been a long time coming...
Back
in the mid 1970s a very small department of experts - who came to be
called 'Electronic Effects Operators' had been formed - consisting
of Dave Chapman, Dave Jervis and Mitch Mitchell - under the
management of Bob Wright. They were used primarily to operate
the inlay and overlay desks in studio galleries during the recording
of shows. However - they realised that some effects were best
achieved after the recording. In fact, you might say
'post-production' - although nobody called it that back then.
Previously,
any video effects would have been done in the gallery at the time of
recording. Editing was simply that - making a final cut of the
show. Such things as colour grading for video material or any
kind of video post production were almost unheard of back then.
Mitch describes how a typical effect was created...
'The
Blake's 7 teleport effect with the white line was a hand drawn matte
for instance so could only be applied to a pre-filmed sequence or
after the video was layed down to tape. These things were only
possible after the availability of the video frame brought about by
1"C format and frame stores of which Quantel were the main UK protagonists.'
These
complex effects were done in ordinary studio galleries whilst the
studio floor was being used for a set and light day. However,
this wasn't ideal to say the least. Mitch thought that it was
'nuts' to be using expensive studio galleries for this kind of
work. Also - some were better equipped than others. He
pressed hard to have a dedicated area created for this expanding area
of TV production.
The
requirement was for a room containing vision mixing and video effect
facilities, some VT machines and a camera with a small area of blue
screen and space to shoot models and miniatures. The old puppet
theatre was the perfect place but despite management promises that it
was about to happen it was many years before it did. As well as
the obvious issue of the cost of setting it up there is little doubt
that the union had serious concerns about these individuals
apparently doing the work of several separate specialists.
Remember that in the 1970s the unions in Britain were not known for
their flexibility and willingness to embrace change! In fact,
Mitch and the others were all union members, had all been cameramen
and were already in some ways doing the work of vision mixers.
Anyway
- sadly, after much frustration Mitch moved on in 1980 to do this
kind of work for a newly created independent post-production
company. A few years after he left, the video effects workshop
was eventually opened.
A
few other EEOs were created to join the two Daves - Robin Lobb, Adam
McInnes, Nick Moore, Danny Popkin and Ian Simpson. The work
done in this little studio was ground-breaking for its day and it was
used not just for sc-fi programmes but also to paint backgrounds onto
wideshots in dramas, add snow or other weather effects - in fact much
of the kind of work done by very sophisticated CGI today.
Despite
the success of the workshop, by the end of the 1980s things had
moved on and video effects work was being done in post production
suites either in the new stage 5 at TVC or independently by companies
in Soho, so the workshop was closed.
From
1991 this studio became part of the sport graphics area associated
with TC5. One wonders what it will be used for when Sport leave
the building in 2011. Mind you, call me an old cynic but with
the Olympics in 2012 I have a sneaking suspicion that perhaps not
quite all of the Sport dept will be making the move north only a few
months before the greatest sporting event in the UK for decades comes
to London.
Completing
the main block
The
final part of this phase of the construction of Television
Centre was the completion and fitting out of studios 7, 1, and 6 - in
that order. This would finish the building as it was initially
designed. Further expansion along the spur was in the concept
phase only and no detailed plans existed at that time.
TC7
is almost exactly the same design as TC2 and TC5 (and also with long
lighting bars) although it is a couple of feet longer. Sources
differ as to when it opened but it was probably in 1962.
According to the 1963 BBC Handbook (Jan 1963) it opened in 1962 but
an IEE publication, 'The BBC Television Centre and its Technical
Facilities', dated May 1962, states that 'TC7, as well as TC1 and
TC6, will be gradually equipped and brought into service during 1963
and 1964.' TC6 was a long way from being brought into service
so maybe they were wrong about TC7 too. Possibly they decided
to postpone TC6 and wait for colour so TC7 came into service ahead of
schedule. Do let me know if you can add any evidence to
confirm the date please.
Its
design was very similar to the first four studios and the equipment
fit was also along the same lines. It originally had black and
white Marconi MkIV cameras but was colourised with EMI 2001s in July
1968. Play School was based in this studio for many
years, providing excellent training opportunities for young cameramen
and boom ops and not so young trainee lighting directors. I
still have in my garage a set of colour filters dating from the late
1980s that I carefully cut out and stapled together to create a very
interesting underwater effect around the cyclorama end of the
studio. The director said she was very impressed but I think
she was just being kind.
TC7
was used in later years for The Late Show, after it moved from
Lime Grove, although of course dozens of other relatively small scale
shows including panel games like Call My Bluff, cookery
programmes with the likes of Delia Smith and childrens
programmes such as Bodger and Badger were made in this
studio. The original three series of Vic and Bob's Shooting Stars
from 1995 to1997 also came from here. In 2002 it moved to TC1,
which was quite a contrast.
From
1976, each Saturday TC7 was given over to live kids' TV - starting
with Multi-Coloured Swap Shop until 1982 when it was succeeded
by Saturday Superstore, then Going Live and finally
Live and Kicking. After a couple of series L&K
moved to TC6 in 1997 - officially only occupying the same floor area
as TC7 but, surprise surprise, the set gradually stretched over the
years until it almost filled that studio!
|
 |
A
typical production gallery in the late '60s - in this case TC7.
PA on the left, then director, then vision mixer. Confusingly,
the vision mixer is also the name of the equipment he or she operates.
Until
the 1980s all TVC's studios had the BBC-designed 2-bank system with
8 inputs - each with a fader and button beneath. This was a
totally different operating philosophy from the commercially designed
mixers (switchers) in use everywhere else in the world.
Nowadays,
all BBC studios use the same vision mixers as in other studios -
usually made by Grass Valley, Sony or Thomson. |
I have
been sent an anecdote by Mike Renshall relating to BBC vision mixers,
similar to the one above. They could generate fancy 'wipes' by
using a plug-in module - these were kept in a small flight case by
the studio engineers. The pattern of the wipe was illustrated
on the cartridge that you plugged in for the desired effect.
Mike was a trainee engineer, working in TC5, when...
|
'...one
day a vision mixer lady came into the back room and asked me (a
young trainee on my own) for the 'box of 100 wipes'. I of
course didn't know then that this referred to the plug-in wipe
modules for the BBC EP5/512 vision mixer (the one with the two
quadrant faders on the mixer top and the 'clunk click' channel
buttons) so offered her.. er.. a box of Kimwipes. How embarrassing!'
|
Back
in the early '60s the 'works block' was also finished on the east
side of the site. This was topped with a 13-storey office block
- the East Tower - which was completed in 1964. Although
built at the same time as the rest of the main block it was not part
of the original design and does not appear on any of the early models
or drawings. It seems like an afterthought and looks quite out
of place with the rest of the site. Its materials do not match
those used on the other buildings and its design is typical of the
type of bland office block of the period which seems surprising,
given the unique nature and high quality of the design of the rest of
TV Centre. Not surprisingly, given its age and poor quality
construction, it is now looking pretty tatty and in need of
renovation. If and when TV Centre is sold by the BBC in a few
years' time it is hard to imagine this tower surviving for long
afterwards, even if the main block facing Wood Lane is retained for
planning reasons.
The
LWT tower on the South Bank, albeit several stories higher, was built
eight years later and is a much better design - nicely integrated
into the rest of the LWT studio centre. Indeed, it is its
defining feature and still looks very good even today. It is
really disappointing that the East Tower did not achieve a similar
effect at TVC.
TC1
opened on 15th April 1964. (I'm sure I remember watching a Blue
Peter special on the day.) It was of course equipped with
monochrome cameras and would have to wait until 1968 before it was
colourised using EMI 2001 cameras. It was said to be the
largest television studio in Europe although actually studio 5 at
Wembley was and is much larger when it has its dividing doors open at
14,000 sq ft gross. TC1 is 11,000 sq ft gross or 100 x 90
metric feet between firelanes and its size has proved immensely
useful for all kinds of productions. These used to be major
dramas and operas or variety shows like Morcambe and Wise or The
Black and White Minstrel Show.
In the last few years it has come into its own with popular shows
like Strictly Come Dancing,
'Maria', 'Joseph' and
'Nancy', Let Me Entertain You, Last Choir Standing and
Maestro. These
big spectacular productions simply won't fit into any other London
studio except for Fountain and have enabled the BBC to present shows
that are visually second to none.
Originally
it was going to have a section of the floor that could have been
lowered with motors. The official BBC book about the Centre
published in 1960 states 'A
pit is provided, fifty feet long by thirty feet wide which can be
filled with water and will have above it a sectional floor that can
descend to a maximum depth of 7 ft 6 ins.'
The idea went away before it was built but that part of the studio
apparently still has a different maximum weight loading from the
rest. I can't think what kind of television production would
safely be able to make use of a tank containing thousands of gallons
of water and in the event I suppose others couldn't either. I
imagine that the problem of how to make the join in the floor so
perfect that cameras could track over it without any disturbance to
the picture also proved to be a bit of a headache. It does
indicate though that at the time of designing the building, cost was
almost irrelevant and all they wanted were the best possible studios
with the best possible facilities.
|
 |
|
One
of the most celebrated programmes to come out of TC1 - I
Claudius.
This picture was taken in 1976. I can be fairly certain of
that as I am the cablebasher on the far right of the frame.
(And that was a serious cable to bash, I can tell you.) This
series was the first I worked on when joining the BBC and I assumed
at the time that the rest of my career would be spent working on
programmes just like this one. Ah well.
The
others in the photo are Patrick Stewart as Sejanus, Ian Perry on the
camera and in the white T-shirt - Herby Wise, the director.
Note
the panning handle on the camera is angled up at 90 degrees.
This was a technique used by Jim Atkinson, senior cameraman of crew
5, and it enabled the camera to be controlled more easily when
crabbing and panning. This technique of fluid camerawork with
the ped always on the move and operating on a wide lens close to the
action was pioneered by Jim. It was very similar to today's
fashionable use of hand-held or steadycam mounted cameras and was
arguably 30 years ahead of its time. |
TC6
is an interesting case. At the time the shell of the studio was
built it was intended to install dividing doors and two sets of
galleries. It is therefore rotated through 90 degrees compared
with all the other studios and has its long wall running along the
scenery runway. The idea of being able to split it was abandoned
before the studio was fitted out. The lighting bars in TC6 are
slightly further apart along the centre line because the grid was
designed to make allowance for the doors that were never fitted.
Because this studio is 'sideways on' people occasionally describe it
as being long and narrow. In fact it is the same width as TC3
at 70 metric feet and only two feet longer than the other medium
studios at 92 metric feet.
The
opening of TC6 was delayed until 1967 so that it could become the
BBC's first colour studio. BBC2 officially went colour in July
of that year. The first production was Once More With Felix starring
Julie Felix. (Remember her? Just me then.)
|
 |
|
Once
More With Felix. The first programme made in colour in
TC6. Looks fab doesn't it. In those days they used fairy
lights rather than Varilites. (Sorry.) You can actually
see these lights in action on a clip of Leonard Cohen (who was a
guest on this show) on YouTube. Don't watch if you can't take
too much excitement.
Note
the cardboard lens hoods. The real ones had not yet
arrived. Also note the grey floor and brown cyc.
In
the late '60s following years of experiments at AP and studio H at
Lime Grove the BBC had drawn up a book of rules as to what was and
was not acceptable to transmit in colour. It was almost as
though they didn't want too much colour on screen as it might alarm
the viewer. Hence, for the first few years the most popular
colour for cycloramas and scenery in general was brown. Lovely. |
|
A
potted history of early colour cameras...
It
had been a long wait before a good quality, reliable colour camera
was available. In 1966 there were three main camera
manufacturers: Philips, Marconi and EMI. The BBC carried
out a three-way test over several months in Pres B using the
programme Late Night Line-up. Engineers in the studio
examined their reliability - Marconi provided their own maintenance
engineer, the other companies left it to the BBC ones.
Meanwhile, other members of the BBC great and good watched the
pictures at home and made notes. A decision had to be made
urgently so that the first studios could be equipped in 1967.
Philips
(under the brand name 'Peto-Scott') had its PC60 which was very good
quality but perhaps a little soft - it had only three tubes.
Also, the company was not British - therefore at a disadvantage with
regard to the BBC. Nevertheless, two OB units were equipped
with PC60s in 1967.
Marconi
had its Mk VII which was much sharper, having four tubes. This
camera was designed in the mid '60s for the export market - in
particular America - and with its lens bolted onto the front it meant
that a wide selection of lenses could be used. It was built
using military-grade components and its electronic design was very
advanced. Ruggedness and reliability were intended to be key
features. The camera was sharp but its colourimetry was not
liked by all - some described faces as looking sun-tanned, others
simply thought that faces looked pink. Someone has described
the picture to me as looking like a black and white image with the
colour added on top - which of course is exactly what it was.
Its luminance tube produced an image and the colour information from
the other three tubes was superimposed.
The
main problem with the Mk VII was its weight and its length. It
was so long that the kind of camera moves used on studio dramas or
light entertainment shows were not possible without using a separate
assistant or 'dolly-op' to move the camera pedestal. Peds had
to have a larger diameter steering ring fitted but when the cameraman
stood behind it he couldn't reach the ped with his feet.
Therefore he could not track or crab the ped in the usual way.
The
third camera was supplied by EMI. Some sources say this was
named 2000, others 2001. It was a long time ago and memories
are not that reliable. Anyway, this camera was the nearest to
the BBC's specifications. In seeking sales EMI had worked very
closely with the BBC to produce exactly what they wanted. It
was compact with an integral zoom lens so cameramen and directors
loved it. Its electronics were less advanced than the Marconi
which supposedly made it easier to line up and maintain. Its
colourimetry was also closest to the BBC spec and (in its 1968
incarnation) produced very good flesh tones. This camera used a
different technique from the Marconi Mk VII, using the green tube to
produce the image whilst the luminance tube supplied only the fine
detail information. Perhaps surprisingly, this appeared more
natural on screen in many people's eyes.
However
- the only tubes that gave really good quality were Plumbicons -
invented by Philips. Naturally, they were reluctant to see
other manufacturers use them. Marconi got round this by selling
cameras without tubes and asking the TV companies to order them
direct from Philips which, surprisingly, they were willing to
do. Marconi had allegedly bought some Plumbicons for
development purposes claiming they were for 'medical use'.
According to a technical paper by an EMI man named McGee, EMI
attempted to develop lead-based tubes too but found it too difficult
to get the mix just right and layer thickness uniform enough.
They were therefore forced to use much less sophisticated Vidicon
tubes but these were nowhere near as good as the Plumbicon. TV
camera enthusiast Paul Marshall has written to me explaining the problem...
'I
proved this for myself when I got the Marconi Coffin camera and the
EMI (vidicon colour) 204 camera going for the NMPFT (National
Museum of Photography, Film and Television). Our 'scene', a
red dalek, was perfect on the coffin, but the red sensitive vidicons
just couldn't give a nice looking dalek (the blue and green tubes had
so much red and infra red sensitivity that they always saw something
through the crude dichroic and thus de-saturated reds. Flesh
tones were awful plus the low light shading, noise and microphony to
boot! Horrible.'
|
Ex
EMI engineer Dave Craddock has written to me with his story.
He was EMI's technical manger in Australia and New Zealand betwen
1962 and 1966. In late 1963 he had four 204s that he demo'd at the
'Sydney Showground'. This included an interview with the
Australian PM, Robert Menzies.
He
describes the 204 as three EMI 201s in the same box with Vidicon
tubes, each providing an R, G or B signal. He says that
although the 201 was a good camera, having 3 together made
registering the images very difficult, especially when the heat began
to build up.
I'd
better not repeat here what Dave thought of the people who were
running EMI at the time. However, he took a very dim view of
the person who ordered cheap capacitors, most of which proved faulty.
They had to be replaced with Philips ones ironically and he says he
filled a tea chest with the dud ones once a month. Dave became
so disenchanted that he resigned and joined RCA in 1966, before the
2001 came on the scene. |
What
happened at the BBC tests is not 100% clear. However, it seems
more than likely that the results were a disaster for EMI. The
camera was clearly not as good as the Marconi. The BBC
engineers were dismayed as the camera designed to their spec wasn't
the one that produced the best pictures.
Something
had to be done fast to be ready for colour to begin in 1967.
Reluctantly, the BBC ordered 17 Marconi Mk VIIs which, thanks to
Marconi pulling out all the stops, were duly delivered on time.
These were installed in TC6, TC8 and one of the studios at Alexandra
Palace for BBC2 News. Meanwhile EMI went back to the drawing
board, persuaded Philips to sell them some Plumbicon tubes and spent
months integrating them into the camera's design. After a great
deal of work they came up with a revised design ready for delivery in 1968.
However,
I have also been sent an interesting email by Charles Hope - a
retired senior BBC engineer - that casts a somewhat different light
on this story. He writes...
'At
the time of this work, I was involved with the BBC Motoring Club
(one of the many 'social' sections) and got to know the Head Of
Designs Department (Neville Watson) very well. He told me that
everybody (Research, Designs and Operations) wanted to use EMI
cameras but the Director of Engineering insisted the Marconi gave the
best results. In 1968, about a year after the Marconis had come
into service, DE gave a major talk in the Theatre, fed sound only to
all studios, in which he apologised for buying the 'wrong'
cameras. He retired shortly afterwards.'
At
first glance this seems to contradict the other version of events -
but not necessarily. Firstly, it would be nice to know a bit
more about this rather surprising announcement and apology. I
would certainly like to know the exact words the Director of
Engineering used - and exactly what it was he was apologising
for. Perhaps for causing so much extra work by having to swap
cameras round the studios so soon after they were bought.
However, he clearly felt at the time that he had no choice but to go
with the Marconi. Bear in mind that it does seem that the EMI
wasn't as good in 1966 as it became a year or two later after more
development work was done. It is also frankly not very
surprising that all those engineers wanted the EMI chosen if they had
contributed so much to its design.
All
this is most intriguing. Can you shed any further light?
|
|
 |
The
author in 1976 with an EMI 2001 trying to look as though I know what
I'm doing.
The
picture was taken in studio A at the BBC's engineering training
centre at Wood Norton, Evesham.
This
print has been skulling about in the bottom of a drawer for 30 years
and is a little the worse for wear. |
|
Opinions
differ strongly as to the relative merits of the various cameras of
the day. Those with ties to Marconi believe that their cameras
were trashed unfairly by the BBC and that some sort of rivalry or
worse existed between the Corporation and Marconi.
Interestingly, having seen this statement, a retired senior BBC
engineer has written to me ...
'As
a maintenance engineer in Central Area (later to become Television
Network) we learned very early on to hate Marconi kit. It was
very unreliable! Cameras, Picture monitors, Sync Pulse
generators (I had the misfortune to have to commission one when on
attachment to SPID) all failed far more often than other makes.
My former colleagues in what was Transmitter (Transmission)
department had the same feeling about Marconi transmitters.'
Of
course this is only one person's opinion. Other engineers may
have had a different experience. Certainly, there are several
examples of Marconi MkVIIs in use by enthusiasts today who say that
the cameras are reliable, well-built and still produce very nice
pictures. They sold very well all over the world - unlike the
EMI 2001. They were also popular OB cameras with some of the
ITV companies. I have, however, had an email from Ian Hillson
who seems to be following the BBC line of the day...
'As
an engineer, the thing I remember about them was the huge spares
cabinet that you needed - every unit inside it seemed to have been
designed by a different individual design team using their favourite
components - so you had everything in there, transistors, nuvistors,
thick film circuits, thin film circuits....
And
Marconi only ever used salmon pink wire, so it was impossible to
trace thro'...
And
it was single core, so started to break as they used it at the hinge
on the fold down front of the CCU....
And,
I seem to remember, the lens they used was for an IO and gave a huge
image size for the plumbicon and not enough back-focus to accommodate
the block, hence needed relay optics - and lost more light! And
it had a very Michael Mouse fixing system of a guillotine handle
locking (or not quite locking) into an ineffectual slot around the
back of the lens. Methinks that everyone of my age has seen the
zoom lens fall off a MkVII...'
So
the 2001 became the favourite of the BBC - both cameramen and
engineers liking it - and of course it remained in use for many
years. It was also bought to equip studios by most of the big
ITV companies including Thames, LWT, ITN, Yorkshire, Granada and
ATV. They would certainly not have ordered it if they had not
preferred it for studio work over the Marconi or Philips.
Incidentally,
I have been told by a retired BBC engineer of an apocryphal story
concerning the time Granada was choosing whether to buy EMI or
Marconi colour cameras. It seems that the EMI was producing
better pictures and when the man from Marconi came to try and improve
results he is supposed to have said " A side by side comparison
- that's not fair." Actually, I think this tale says as
much about the attitude of BBC engineers as it might about Marconi cameras.
The
2001 was not without fault however - arguably no more reliable than
the Marconi and prone to noise in some examples. It was also
not good at coping with dark scenes in plays - noise, smearing and
curious colour casts are to be seen in old tapes. Its greatest
strength was also its weakness. Its integral lens made it
unsuitable as an OB camera where lenses are often changed and
overseas TV companies did not like it for the same reason. Only
two zoom lenses would fit it. Its colourimetry was not liked
outside the UK. The subtle tones it produced - giving excellent
rendition of faces - also made it appear cool and desaturated with
some material. In particular, most US companies did not like it
at all.
Thus
the original Marconis were removed from TC6 and TC8 after less than
a year and used by the BBC where camera movement would not be an
issue - in news studios and the Pres studios. All the other
studios were equipped with the EMI 2001.
Marconi
and EMI each went on to develop a camera that was the opposite of
the Mk VII and 2001 respectively. Marconi produced the Mk VIII
with its integral lens and much improved colourimetry. In 1970
it was arguably the most advanced camera design in the world.
The BBC allegedly indicated that they were interested in purchasing
80! Oddly, they actually bought only two - for a news OB
unit. Actually, probably three. Ian Hillson and Roy
Adcock found one in a cupboard in Elstree in 2000, apparently brand
new and with a number 3 on it. Ian had been an engineer
occasionally working with the 2-camera OB unit and he was
particularly cross... '..."only
bought two" ... pah! They lied to us...'
One
person who worked for Marconi has told me that he believes that the
automatic line-up it possessed was not liked by the unions - fearing
job losses - and the BBC did not want any industrial problems so
avoided it.
A
BBC engineer on the other hand recalled to me that his memory of the
camera was that the automatic line-up was prone to errors and that a
conventional line-up was often required in addition to the automatic
one. I have also been told by another senior engineer of the
day that 'The
automatic line up created enormous problems because it couldn't be
switched off! Lens aberrations at the edge of the picture could
result in the camera deciding that the tube registration needed
adjustment even when on air.' However,
Paul Marshall has written to me with this observation... 'Oh,
dear, of course you can, it's a switch in the automatics drawer with
several positions, including 'off !' The automatics were never
perfect, that's true, but they weren't bad if the tubes were from the
same batch, correctly oriented and the beam current set-up
right. The later, MkVIIIB had a pair of 'size corrector' pots
that mopped up a lot of problems to do with through the lens v.
diascope line-up. Lenses for tubed cameras invariably had
chromatic aberration and inherently the diascope doesn't. Thus,
there were width and height registration errors when you went back to
the lens. The pots compensated for this and things were much
better. I think this is what your chap is talking about.' Reading
between the lines it does seem to me that the automatic functions of
the Mk VIII were perhaps not quite as automatic as Marconi might have
led potential purchasers to believe.
Ian
Hillson takes the same view as the other BBC engineers...
'...The
cameras were awful and needed a final tweak after auto line-up.
They had motorised pots on the CCU to store the settings! Fun to watch....
One
of the problems as you say was that the diascope (obviously) didn't
use all the elements in the lens - so you were still left with a bit
of chromatic lens aberration to try and reduce. And the green
tube scan patch was smaller than the red and blue ones, just to make
registration errors worse - methinks that this gave the camera
greater sensitivity (same light over smaller tube area) - sadly being
three tube it was "contours out of green" which gave rise
to soft & noisy red carpets at royal events!'
Ken
Banwell - ex HTV engineer - has written to me with broadly similar
views of the Mk VIII
'I
came across them at HTV, who had 12 or 13, including 2 of the 3
preproduction ones. The other was with the BBC News OB
unit. I notice that [Ian Hillson}says that the green scan patch
was smaller than the red and blue. It was the other way around
- the red and blue had minifiers on to increase sensitivity.
The automatics after the addition of the additional pots worked quite
well if set up. The main problem was reliability from the wee
cees - the red ones which burned out, the fans on the PSU`s that
melted until replaced by metal ones and the camera head power supply
(I still have one) which was a designers dream and an engineer's
nightmare. I could still line up a CCU without much thought
after 20 odd years, I did it so often. HTV tried twice to use
one on an OB. It never worked so they gave up and used a 2001
from studios if an extra camera was required.'
'A
designer's dream and an engineer's nightmare' seems to be a common
theme in what most people have told me. Whether the Mk VIII was
or was not liked by engineers, a cameraman who operated one told me
that it felt odd in use - because the viewfinder and lens were
offset. In any event, the Mk VIII did very well in the export
world so Marconi stayed in business.
EMI
developed the 2005 after several years' research. One wonders
what they had been up to. A long, ugly 3-tube camera with its
lens bolted on the front was the result. It produced soft,
muddy pictures and was disliked by cameramen and engineers
alike. None were ordered for the BBC's London studios. To
my knowledge, only BBC Manchester and LWT's studio at Wycombe Road
were equipped with these cameras in the UK.
Within
a short time EMI abandoned broadcast camera manufacture. It is
astonishing how they could have thrown their lead in this market
away. Sure, the integral lens of the 2001 made it difficult to
sell abroad but there was no excuse for subsequently producing a
camera that produced such bad pictures.
Meanwhile,
Philips quietly came up with the LDK-5. A superb camera with
triax cable that became the workhorse of BBC OBs and TV companies all
over the world.
So
in the late '70s the BBC were left without a suitable studio
camera. It was not politically acceptable to order a
non-British camera to equip BBC studios. They persuaded a
little company that made CCTV security cameras - Link - to come up
with a design. The 110 was a soft 3-tube camera with integral
lens that was not particularly liked by anyone but was just about
acceptable. Its physical design was not very sophisticated, as
this experience from a Thames engineer indicates...
'At
Thames I had experience of the Marconi Mk VIIs, EMI 2001s
and the dreadful Link 110s. The camera cable connector
was attached to the chassis by 4 quarter inch, self tapping
screws. One day we noticed a couple on the floor and then
spotted camera 1 tracking across the floor with its connector hanging
in free air!'
The
next design from Link that came along in the early 1980s was
genuinely very good - the 125. Most of the BBC's studios were
eventually equipped with this camera. Limehouse, too, ordered
it after an exhaustive test looking for the best camera available at
the time. Everything was fine until Link went on to the next
generation - the 130. This model was developed in the mid 1980s
to the latest BBC spec. A set of cameras was delivered to be
installed in Elstree A. The studio was due to open with them in 1989.
Sadly,
the 130 overreached itself in what it was trying to do with the
technology that was available to the company at that time. It
attempted to have an automatic microprocessor-controlled line-up but
failed. Despite all the efforts of Link and BBC engineers they
could not make the cameras work reliably. Oddly, at the time
Marconi had a perfectly good camera (Mk IX) that did more or less the
same thing - except that apparently it worked! For some reason,
the BBC would not contemplate buying the Marconi. Very
odd. Shortly afterwards Marconi, too, ceased broadcast camera manufacture.
Having
already bought some lenses to fit the Link 130s they had ordered,
the BBC were left with a problem. They had to find a suitable
camera that would fit them. The answer was found in France,
believe it or not. In 1989, a set of Thomson 1530s - one of the
last tubed cameras on the market, was purchased for studio A at
Elstree. These were (of course) modified to BBC specs and were
renamed 1531s. Thus began a relationship with Thomson that was
to last a decade. 4:3 CCD models followed by widescreen models
were subsequently bought for almost all the BBC's studios over the
next decade. (The exception was at Elstree where the EastEnders
studios bought Philips LDK 100s, which are still in use.)
Since
2004 Sony has become the BBC's manufacturer of choice, with almost
all the TV Centre studios now equipped with E-30 cameras, although
TC1 and TC8 were fitted with high definition HDC-1500s in 2006 and
TC4 in 2008.
Some
might say that thanks to BBC camera policy during the 1960s-1980s -
EMI, Marconi and Link were all forced to give up involvement in
broadcast television. You could say that EMI and Link failed
because they were too closely involved with the BBC and Marconi
failed because it somehow antagonised them. However, you can't
have it both ways. Can the BBC really be held responsible
because it ordered or didn't order various cameras? What is
certainly true is that all these companies had to give up at some
point because their latest camera could not be sold in sufficient
quantities at home and abroad.
Whatever
the reason, there is now no British manufacturer of broadcast
television cameras.
If
you were part of this process and can add any information - or of
course if you disagree with any of the above I'd love to hear!
Golden
Age Television Recreations is a company that hires working examples
of old TV cameras. Their
website has some excellent images of most of the cameras mentioned
above. Go to their 'equipment for hire' page.
|
Back
to the late '60s and the dawn of colour on BBC2...
Of
course, costume drama was a perfect subject for colour and the first
made in TC6 was Vanity Fair, starring Susan Hampshire.
The series began in October 1967.
It had
been decided that the two big studios 6 and 8 were to be equipped for
colour and would open within a few weeks of each other. It was
also decided that TC6, 7 and 8 would share a common apparatus room
but in the event this proved to be a nightmare for the studio
engineers to operate. Within a few years walls were built and
each studio had its own separate area and dedicated engineers like
all the other studios.
Roderick
Stewart has written to me with an amusing anecdote...
|
'Studios
TC6, 7 and 8 did indeed have a combined apparatus room as you
describe, but by the time I worked there, they'd already put up
Marley blinds to separate the areas belonging to each studio, because
the original plan was not as practical as they'd thought. There was a
common monitoring desk (known as the "Magic desk") which
had been included with the intention of checking colour consistency
between the three studios, but it was hardly used, and eventually
dismantled, though one of the control panels was so integrated with
the workings of other equipment that we couldn't disconnect it, so we
just buried it under the floorboards where it could sometimes be seen
glowing through the cracks between them. It probably puzzled
whoever eventually dismantled the studios for their next refurbishment.'
|
One
other item of interest about these three studios - they were
initially designed to be dual 525 and 625-line capable. This
came as a surprise to me when I discovered it as I would have thought
that exporting programmes to the US was not a high priority in those
days - unlike ATV at Elstree. However, I have been informed by
one of the engineers responsible for the installation that TC6 did
indeed make at least one programme in 525-line NTSC which was
subsequently converted to 625-line PAL by the BBC's standards
converter. The programme was a play - Charley's Aunt -
starring Danny La Rue and made in 1969. I have also been
informed that at the time the studios were designed there were no
625-525 converters, only ones converting from the US standard.
(625-525 standards converters came a little later.) Thus, to
make a programme for export to the US you had to make it in 525
lines. It also seems that one current affairs programme for the
USA came out of TVC for the London contributions and was made in
525-line NTSC.
Interestingly,
there were some problems using the 525 lines/60Hz system as the
frequency sometime 'beat' with the studio lighting causing a
flicker. The lights were fed by normal 240 volt AC current
which of course alternates at 50Hz. (50 Hz means that the
electric current alternates fifty times per second.) ATV's
studios at Elstree apparently got round this by using a DC feed to
their lighting, which therefore did not flicker.
Roderick
Stewart has some more information on the 525-line capability of
these studios...
|
'There was one set of 525 line NTSC equipment which could in
theory be assigned to any of the three studios at the flick of a
switch, but I only ever saw it used twice, and each time it was a
nightmare of clattering relays, followed by hours of diagnostics to
trace which ones had stuck and which DC fuses had blown because the
system hadn't been used for years. Thinking about all the
things that had to be switched, the pulse feeds to the cameras and
encoders, RGB feeds from cameras to encoders, inputs to and RGBS
outputs from rack mounted decoders to colour monitors, and feeds to a
separate waveform monitor and vectorscope, it was amazing it ever
worked at all.
Not only that but there was some relay logic intended as an
interlock to prevent two studios from being assigned the 525 NTSC
gear at the same time. If it had been necessary to switch it
every day there might have been some sense in all this complication,
but in reality it was more trouble than it was worth.'
|
TC1,
TC6 and TC8 were designed with a new short lighting bar system with
one dual-source luminaire on a rolling trolley on each bar.
Each bar is only 4 feet long and spaced with their ends 3 feet
apart. (In TC1 this distance is 4 feet.) Each row of bars
is spaced four feet apart, rather than the 6 feet in 'long bar'
studios. This arrangement gives much greater flexibility to the
lighting director. Top light entertainment LD Dickie Higham
used to have his own studio classification which baffled many a
colleague (including me) until the penny dropped. According to
him, TC1, TC2, TC3 and TC8 were all 'long bar studios.' The
rest were 'short bar' ones. He was, of course, referring to the
distance from the studio to the BBC Club.
|
The
dual-source luminaires designed by Derek Lightbody (no, really) were
first installed in TC6 and TC8 when they opened, then the rest of the
studios at TVC, and D and E at Lime Grove. There were even some
at Television Theatre. They were a clever way of reducing
rigging time and offering more flexibility to the lighting
director. They are commonly called 'twisters' by everybody in
the industry except those who actually use them in the BBC. The
'pointy' end - with a fresnel lens and barndoors - was fitted with a
5kW lamp which had two filaments, each rated at 2½ kW. You
could use either or both filaments by using a pole-operated
switch. When the Link cameras were installed in the studios,
these needed less light so the filament size changed to 1¼ and
2½ kW. So far so good.
The
'soft' end wasn't really, since the reflector was only about 18
inches square. However, the original lanterns - called 'Quarts'
by Berkey, the manufacturer - were fitted with a very good eggcrate,
giving quite a bit of control over the spread. Thus, they
actually made excellent softened keylights and were used as such on
many dramas and sitcoms.
I
shouldn't really use the past tense as they are still in use - or at
least newer versions are - in all eight main studios at TVC.
Sadly, the newer lanterns designed by Lee Colortran have soft ends
with eggcrates giving far less control but they are a bit
softer. Other manufacturers have also made their versions.
Beware the Kohoutek! This monster attempted to use the same
bulb for both ends and was a complete disaster. Sadly it is
still to be found in a couple of the smaller studios at TVC.
Believe it or not the lantern is named after a comet that promised
astronomers a great show but when actually observed was a huge
disappointment. According to Wikipedia...
'Because
Comet Kohoutek fell far short of expectations its name became
synonymous with spectacular duds.'
Who'd
have though it?
I
am told that one of the reasons the original Berkey lanterns were
replaced in the 1980s was that a very useful material was allegedly
used as insulation in their construction. Yes - you guessed it
- asbestos. God only knows how much of the stuff was knocked
out of them over the years whilst being beaten with a stick by
enthusiastic electricians. Let's face it...we're doomed.
|
|
 |
TV
Centre probably in 1960. TC1 is built but not fitted out.
TC8 has yet to be constructed. |
Stage
4
was the construction of the first section of the spur. In 1959,
months before the building had opened, a meeting was held to discuss
what would be included in the first section of the spur. They
decided that it would contain another medium to large studio - TC8
and the new news centre.
Preliminary
work began in 1963 and by 1966 the basic shell of the building was
complete. The occupation of the news area was postponed,
however, by the World Cup. The BBC, as host broadcaster, had to
house the world's TV companies for the contest so the space was
turned into facilities for them. A temporary studio was built,
equipped with EMI 203 black and white cameras, which following the
World Cup was used as the weather studio whilst Pres A was being
colourised. Once this was over work could resume on equipping
the studios and newsrooms.
The
design of TC8 benefited from the experience gained working in the
older studios. It is said to be the most popular studio amongst
many programme makers. Its galleries are well laid out, the
studio is slightly wider than the others at 72 metric feet by 90
metric feet within firelanes and it was the first studio built with
retractable audience seating. This enables a greater floor area
to be used than the other studios when an audience is present.
It also has the same short lighting bars as in TC1 and TC6. It
has a better ventilation system than the other studios, in which the
cool air enters via vents distributed all over the grid. The
other studios use pipes spaced a few metres apart around the top of
the walls that pump cool air over the top of the cyc. I believe
it is also the only studio at TVC in which no asbestos was used in
its construction.
TC8
opened in 1967 with Marconi MkVII colour cameras a few weeks after
TC6. The Marconis only lasted a few months and by April 1968
they had been replaced with EMI 2001s.
TC8
was also the first studio with thyristor dimmers controlled by a
computer memory console - the Thorn Q-File. This console was
subsequently installed in TV
Theatre and all the other studios at TVC except TC6 and Lime Grove D
and E. These three studios were equipped with the Strand MMS -
'Modular Memory System.' This was a console with fader wheels
rather than the motorised
faders of the Q-File. It had a slightly different operating
philosophy from the Thorn desk which some liked, others
not. It was in fact the predecessor to the Galaxy -
without question the best lighting console ever developed for TV
studios. Almost every studio in the UK is now equipped with one
- they were available to
purchase, in improving versions, from the
early
'80s to the mid '90s.
Their
manufacturer, Strand Lighting, has not offered them for sale for
about 10 years now. Bizarrely, they and all the other console
manufacturers have
not offered
a similar replacement but only consoles that very
few
operators or LDs believe are as suitable
for television as
the old Galaxy. Thus, these old lighting desks soldier
on. Spare parts are acquired from old consoles being replaced
in theatres or studios
all over the world. A few years ago, the BBC even bought an
old Galaxy from Russia.
When
one of the many lighting console
manufacturers have
a
new one
for sale that is as good as a Galaxy then they will probably sell
about 30 of them within a year or two. Sadly, this won't be Strand.
They went bust in 2006 and part of what remained of them was taken
over by an American company, who were subsequently bought by
Philips. The current range of Strand consoles are very much
aimed at theatre use.
TC7
and TC8 were later equipped with a
radical re-development of the Q-File called the 'Thornlight.'
It had obviously been designed by a committee and was in some ways
rather clumsy to operate. However, once you got the hang of it
it was extremely flexible and I personally really got to like
it. These were later replaced by Galaxys, as eventually was
TC6's MMS, until by the late 1980s the only studios still with a
Q-File were TC1 and Television Theatre.
|
The
curious saga of the QII
To
continue along this rather specialised lighting console tangent...
...a
handful of' senior 'lighting and vision control supervisors'
(console operators) at the BBC decided in the mid '80s that the
Thornlight was rubbish and that the old Thorn Q-File was better than
the Strand Galaxy. There was, as it happened, a problem in
re-equipping TC1. It was due to have more than 1000 dimmers
installed in its refurbishment and the software of the Galaxy could
not apparently cope. Thus, they persuaded the BBC research
department to design a console that could control this many
dimmers. It was to be, in effect, a copy of the old Q-File
using modern components and would be called the QII.
It
had only 99 files in its memory which for the kinds of shows that
were being made in TC1 (Children in Need etc) was clearly
inadequate yet the project went ahead. It solved the channel
number problem by including A, B, C and D on its keypad as well as
numbers. Some of the more junior operators like myself were
concerned at what we would be losing compared with the Galaxy.
After some pressure, a modification was made to the design and a
sub-master panel was included - a small victory.
By
the time the console was available and installed in TV Theatre and
TC1 many of those who had pressed for its adoption had retired or
were now LDs. Thus a new generation of console ops had to make
the best of this curious desk. TV Theatre closed in 1991 so the
only one left was in TC1. Eventually, after console operators
had struggled with it for nearly a decade one of the last Galaxies
available was installed in TC1 in 2000. Of course - all the
dimmer numbers on the lighting bars had to be changed as there were
no longer any 'A, B, C, D' dimmer numbers. This was a huge task
in itself! An electronic patching system solved the problem
with the amount of channels - as it could have all along.
Indeed, the same engineers developed an excellent one called
'Leopard' (can't change its spots - geddit?) at the same time as the QII.
This
project was done with the best of intentions and looking back, it is
very hard to understand what the people who drove the whole thing
forward had against the Galaxy. At the time, as a relatively
new console operator I was perfectly happy with the Galaxy but I
suppose I was won over by the enthusiasm of the project leaders.
A couple of TC1 studio engineers and a team of engineers from BBC
Research Department spent years working to develop the QII. For
some reason, I was asked to demonstrate the prototype at the
Institute for Electrical Engineers which was a little awkward as it
was a very simple desk with no effects built in. Indeed - its
simplicity was said to be its main advantage. I did a few
cross-fades, ending up by cutting through a dozen cues as fast as I
could accompanied by some music and everyone applauded. Phew.
This
really was the old BBC at its best and worst. At its best
because it put vast resources into creating something that no
commercial company could supply and which it genuinely thought would
provide the best solution. At its worst because the project was
essentially looking backwards not forwards, it must have cost a
fortune, and clearly had no hope of recouping any of that through sales.
|
The
two news studios on the 6th floor of the Spur, N1 and N2, were
not entirely fitted out with brand new kit, as you might have
expected. According to engineer Bob Taylor, no less than 65
pantechnicons were used to transport cameras, other technical
equipment and all the office contents to TVC from Alexexandra
Palace. The move began on the night of Friday 22nd September
1969. Astonishingly, they had to be ready for a broadcast into
Grandstand the following morning and fully up and runnning by
Monday. People worked for days without going home, grabbing a
few hours sleep when they could on camp beds in a conference room in
order to complete the move without any hitches.
|
 |
|
A
couple of remote-controlled Marconi Mk VIIs in one of the news
studios in 1969. They each had a small 'stand clear' warning
stuck on the panning head. You had to watch out if you stood
too close as the operator, sitting in his control room, might
suddenly move the camera and that huge lens could give one a good old bash.
In
the bottom left corner of the photo can be seen a motor bolted to
the camera ped. This controlled the ped height remotely.
Ian Hillson tells me that one evening, live on air, the feedback loop
fell off the servo of one of these and it powered itself to full
height in vision during a live studio spot. All the racks man
could do was to pan the camera down so the poor reporter ended his
piece witha crick in his neck looking almost straight up into
the grid. Must have looked very dramatic, like the closing shot
of a big movie.
picture
thanks to Roger Smeathers |
Both
news studios were originally about 30 x 40 ft. This was a bit
of a disappointment to the news department, who had become used to
working at Alexandra Palace in studios almost twice as big. It
is odd actually, that they were so small and consequently somewhat
limited in their potential use. However, in 1984 N2 was
enlarged to include the lobby area and prop store that was sited
adjacent to the two studios. It thus became about 40 x 50 ft
but one end has a low ceiling. This enabled a big wideshot of
the studio set to be done at the beginning of the Nine o'Clock News
around that time.
I'm
sure there are plenty of anecdotes of incidents during news
broadcasts from these studios. Please send me some if they are
relatively short and of course amusing/interesting. Well-known
ones of course include Jan Leeming surviving an exploding light bulb
above her head whilst on air in 1980.
On May
23rd 1988 the 6 o'clock News was invaded by several women
protesting against Section 28. Sue Lawley kept cool under fire
whilst Nicholas Witchell sat on a passing lesbian to try to shut her
up. The most impressive part of this was that the protestors
actually found the studio. Most people who work at the Centre
have no idea where they are even now.
Then
there was the 1976 Peter Woods incident - some assumed a little the
worse for wear after a few hours in the BBC Club. In fact it
occured at seven thirty in the evening, during a five-minute bulletin
into BBC2. After several slurred attempts to read out the trade
figures he gave up, saying "Apparently, the trade figures are an
awful lot." Network Control then faded him out and the
continuity announcer had to make a quick apology. Hundreds of
viewers phoned in to complain. His condition was later blamed
on the effect of medication 'for sinus problems.' The news was
always recorded 'PasB' on a domestic video recorder but on his
website Bob Taylor, studio engineer, owns up to having removed the
tape on the spur of the moment and erased it to save Peter's
blushes. The official announcement was that the machine had
been faulty. The incident didn't seem to affect Mr Woods'
career however, and he was even included in the famous Christmas
Morcambe and Wise dancing newsreaders sketch singing the last line.
A
little postscript to this incident: I'm reminded that despite
the 'official' video recording having been lost, Kenny Everett used
to play it during his anarchic radio show. How he got hold of
it is a mystery but apparently a unit in the bowels of Broadcasting
House had the job of transcribing news broadcasts so used to make an
audio recording of the TV news. 'News Sound Recording' dept in
the Spur of TVC also it seems would have had an audio copy so the
mole who leaked the tape to Mr Everett might have worked in either of
those departments. Or of course, neither.
Another
anecdote from Roger Tone's memory bank was recounted to me by Ian
Hillson. It seems that Robert Dougall, one of the 'old school'
BBC newsreaders, liked to sit on his 'lucky cushion' when he was in
front of camera. He was known as being icy cool and with a
somewhat subtle sense of humour. For a bet, one of the crew
(who shall not be named here) placed a fully-charged whoopee cushion
under the favourite 'official' one and the studio crew awaited the
inevitable result when Mr Dougall sat down. He was a little
late into the studio and sat down rather gingerly just before
transmission. The whoopee cushion failed to detonate so all
those in the know spent an agonising 10 minutes during the bulletin
praying that it would not go off during a particularly serious piece
to camera. The studio director, fully appraised of the
situation, instructed the floor manager confidentially over talkback,
"If it goes off on-air I expect you to say 'excuse
me'..." It didn't - and Mr Dougall went to his grave
never knowing how very close to an embarrassing incident on camera he
had been.
N1 and
N2 were closed in 1998 when the new News Centre opened in Stage
6. They became the 'property' of BBC Resources who renamed them
TC10 and TC11 but that department could not afford to refurbish them
so they were left unused for a couple of years.
TC10
(30 x 40ft) was the home of daily afternoon shows The Phone Zone
from April 2000 and then TOTP@Play, both broadcast on
satellite channel UK Play. When this channel
closed down in September 2002 the studio was unused for a while but
then became the home of the Virtual Reality (VR) department until
2004. However, it is not known what VR programmes were made
here. During this period it was also used to make two new
series of Treasure Hunt
for Fremantle in 2002 and 2003.
From
2004, TC10 entered a 'service level agreement' with the Children's
department and was used for presentation and continuity for childrens
programmes on BBC1 and BBC2 replacing TC9 in this role. From
April 2006 the daily Level Up
show was based here. This replaced X-Change
on CBBC channel. Level Up
ended its run in Sep '06. This studio is on long-term booking
to Children's dept until they move to Salford and various children's
series have used the studio over the past two or three years.
TC11
(50 x 40ft) was opened as the home of Liquid News from
February 2002. At the extended end of the studio with the lower
ceiling the 60-Second News set was built. Both these
programmes went out on BBC Three. Liquid News became
very popular with a small but dedicated audience. Initially it
was based in TC0 and then moved to this studio to make way for
CBeebies. The original presenter, Christopher Price, had a dry
innuendo-laden style and the show became very much his vehicle.
Tragically, he died suddenly on 22nd April 2002, at the age of just
34. The show gradually reduced in audience terms and was quite
expensive to produce with reporters being sent to glamorous locations
all round the world. It was axed on 1st April 2004.
TC11
then became the home of BBC Three's 7o'clock
news. This in turn ended in December 2005.
The
studio was subsequently used for a few news-related bookings,
including covering for the main news studios whilst they were being
refurbished in 2006. It has now returned to the BBC Studios
portfolio and is available for general use. I understand that
TC11 is occasionally used by the Sport department.
In
the autumn of 2008 and 2009 it was used for the daily Strictly
Come Dancing spin-off series - It Takes Two.
Previous series had been made at independent studio The Hospital
Club, with its lovely Thomson LDK 6000 HD cameras, so the rather less
sophisticated JVC KY-29D cameras in this studio certainly provided a
bit of a challenge to the lighting and engineering departments, to
say the least.
Back
to the history of the building...
During
the 1980s the site was developed further. Offices were built
behind the scenery block which also contained the telephone exchange
- hence it became known as the EBX block - and opened in 1982.
The multistorey car park for 964 cars just snuck in before such
things became completely impossible for planners to agree to and also
opened in 1982. It was said at the time that planning
permission had only been granted by the council on the condition that
it would be used by those working unsocial hours.
Astonishingly, once opened many such people found it very difficult
to obtain car park tickets and it appeared to be at its fullest
between 09.30 and 17.30 during weekdays as indeed it is now.
Fancy that.
Yet
more office space had to be found so a ring of prefabricated
buildings were set on top of the scenery runway. This became
known as the 'periphery' and these offices containing 15,000 sq ft
opened in 1985, blocking the view of the park previously enjoyed by
those sitting on the terrace outside the BBC Club. This view
had been carefully planned by Dawbarn in the original design and was
no accident. Still - these were the 1980s and offices had to
come first, obviously.
|
 |
The
Centre showing the first section of the spur completed but before
stage 5. |
Television
Rehearsal Rooms
|

Before
moving onto Stage 5 a brief mention ought to be made of the Television
Rehearsal Rooms in North Acton.
Clearly, not part of TVC but very much tied in with the process of
making programmes at the Centre, they were only two stops down the
Central Line.
Mike
Jones has passed to me all sorts of fascinating info about this
little area of TV history. (The picture above is thanks to
him). He used to manage the bookings as part of his job.
When
TV Centre was in the early stages of planning it had been assumed
that rehearsal rooms would be included. However, the BBC at the
time needed about 30 such rooms - all big enough to compare with the
space available in a studio. They soon realised that there
would simply not be sufficient space on site and of course cost was
another issue. Therefore they would continue to book all the
old drill halls and church halls currently in use.
Astonishingly,
this decision caused a flurry of letters to The Times in Nov/Dec
1962 involving a prominent MP and several others. These decried
the despicable treatment of actors by the BBC. The head of
drama at Granada rubbed the BBC's noses in it by pointing out that
Granada had included rehearsal rooms in its new centre.
However, for the first decade of TV Centre's life, actors and
performers would have to slum it as before. (As indeed they do now.)
This
decision was most unpopular, not only with performers but with
directors and producers too. According to Mike Jones - Bill
Cotton Jr, being shown around the Centre for the first time,
nonplussed the assembled top brass by agreeing that it was all
wonderful but then went on to ask; "Where are we supposed to
rehearse?" Bill was just a Light Entertainment producer at
the time but in 1962 was made Assistant Head of Light
Entertainment. In later years he of course became head of Light
Entertainment and then Managing Director of Television. One
can't help thinking that if he had been in charge a few years earlier
there would have been some suitable facilities included at the Centre.
However,
the BBC were eventually forced into making some new
arrangements. In 1968 the government announced a planned
reduction in the size of the Territorial Army and many drill halls
around the capital would close or have a change of use. The BBC
would have to provide its own facilities after all. They drew
up plans and did a deal with a property development company who would
be responsible for building them. The Television Rehearsal
Rooms in Victoria Road, Acton opened on 4th May 1970
containing eighteen large rooms.
The
local press visited soon after opening and reported that the
following programmes were in rehearsal: Dr Finlay's Casebook,
Dad's Army, The Doctors, a drama series called Codename,
Up Pompeii, a Brian Rix farce, and an edition of 30-Minute Theatre.
The
building was very impressive - seven floors high and with a great
view of - well, Acton actually - from the canteen's terrace on the
top floor. The ground floor was where rehearsal props and
hundreds of white poles on bases were stored. (These were used
to denote doorways in sets.) Each of the first to sixth floors
had three very large rehearsal rooms of 70' x 50', 70' x 50' and 80'
x 50'. There was also a large green room on each floor.
The first floor rehearsal rooms even had sprung dance floors.
For
the first twenty years of its life it was very busy with all kinds of
shows being rehearsed - dramas, comedies and variety shows. The
canteen at lunchtime was filled with dozens of famous showbiz stars -
actors, singers and dancers all rubbing shoulders and massaging egos.
Of
course, in the early 1990s it was considered by the accountants that
such facilities ought to make a profit (!?) so a price was put on the
hire of each room. Few programmes could afford to pay the
unrealistic hire rate set by - well - I wonder who? - so sitcoms and
sketch shows mostly moved out to cheaper church halls. (Why
didn't they charge productions the same as other accommodation, one
wonders, then the license payers' money would have stayed within the
BBC, rather than going to the owners of all the less suitable
halls. You see, I simply don't understand how to run a business.)
To be
fair, by the '90s the rooms were not needed by anywhere near as many
productions as in previous years. The change from multicamera
studio drama to single camera shooting meant that the need for
rehearsal rooms for dramas dried up (they were usually rehearsed at
the shooting location) and the old variety shows also went out of fashion.
So -
by the end of the 1990s, two of the floors were being used as the
costume and wig store and the rest was turned into - offices.
Hey ho. It does seem strange that at least one floor could not
have been kept on with its three rooms for rehearsals. The BBC
Comedy department could certainly have kept those in use - and of
course they could also have been rented to independent companies too.
In
fact, a couple of rooms did become vacant around 2007 when it was
clear that the building would soon be disposed of. The office
furniture was cleared away and they became - rehearsal rooms!
They were busy for several months and proved what could have been
done for the previous decade with a bit of - dare I say it -
imagination and common sense.
The
BBC left the building in the spring of 2008. I gather it will
soon be demolished and the site used for flats with retail on the
ground floor. What a shame.
|
Stage
5
In
1978 a steering group had been set up to examine what could be
included in the project to complete TV Centre - in other words, Stage
5. The 'Television Development Committee' chaired by Robin
Scott would examine four or five possibilities. (One of the
intentions was that this final phase of construction would partly
replace the existing facilities at Lime Grove and TV Theatre.)
Their conclusion was to construct stage 5 in two phases - the first
would provide a new videotape area containing 100 machines (in fact
it became 130) and accommodation for staff from Lime Grove. The
second phase would see the construction of a replacement for
Television Theatre (TC9). It was assumed that the project would be
complete by the mid 1980s.
In
fact, construction did not commence until January 1985 and the first
phase was completed in February 1988. It contained no
television studios although at the time it was still assumed that the
new TC9 would be built within a few years. The huge task in
designing the new studio was begun. By October 1985 the plans
were well developed - even to the extent of building a large scale
model in which acoustic tests could be undertaken. The huge
volume of the new studio - far greater than any other built by the
BBC - was raising issues of reverberation within the building and the
possible penetration of traffic noise. Thus the research and
detailed plans for TC9 gathered pace.
To
support the weight of the new building, piles 100 ft deep had to be
driven into the ground. Its largest single girder is 22 metres
long and weighs 12 tons. Despite these superlatives Stage 5 is
a monolithic brick-faced block that does not quite match the colour
or style of the previous construction. The back of the building
is in my view particularly unsympathetic to the original design.
It
includes the BBC post production areas on its upper floors. No
less than 130 VT machines were installed. Rather different from
the 16 machines the VT area in the hub was originally designed for.
The
move of the VT department to stage 5 did not take place
immediately. They had to wait for a new tape format to be
established before equipping all the suites. This format was
the D3 cassette. Developed by Panasonic, the BBC was its first
major customer. A few suites were opened in 1991 and used for
training but the big move to stage 5 happened in January 1992.
The
BBC's post production department had been created in 1989 - combining
film editing with VT editing and sound dubbing. This new
department was, as its name suggests, more concerned with what
happens to the programme after it has been made rather than during
it. From 1991, the new D3 cassette enabled every studio to be
equipped with its own machines in the studio's apparatus room which
were (and are) remotely operated by the studio resource manager who
sits in the production gallery.
The
new VT suites in stage 5 thus became almost entirely used for
editing. In the late '90s as each studio was converted to
digital widescreen, the tape format in general use was changed to
Digital Betacam. This uses the superior component system of recording
whereas D3 recorded composite pictures. It took many years and
several tape formats but with Digital Betacam we at last had a
recording system in use that in playback was indistinguishable from
the original live pictures.
In
2006 the BBC announced that over the next few years
it plans to go over to a tapeless system of recording and
transmitting programmes,
meaning that everything
will be stored on hard disk or server. This will avoid having
to digitise
recordings prior to editing, grading
and dubbing. The transferring of the final edit to a master
tape will become a thing of the past with programmes being
transmitted as data directly off a hard drive. This will
simplify the whole post production process and cut
costs.
TMS/TC0
The
new stage 5 included a music studio on the ground floor. It was
built to replace the TMS (studio H) in Lime Grove and was equipped to
a very high standard. It opened in July 1989 and was planned to
have sufficient space for 40 musicians. It apparently had an
automated Neve 48-channel sound desk together with 2, 8 and 24-track
ATRs. (I was previously mystified as to what these initials
stood for. It was more than a year before Aiden Lunn wrote to
me to point out the obvious. ATR stands for 'audio tape
recorder'. Doh!!!)
The
main floor area is about 45 x 28 ft but it also had a very large
control room, almost half the size of the studio itself and a
separate smaller soundproof 'loud' booth. The whole studio is a
floating box within a box construction. The walls have variable
acoustic panels that can be turned round for hard or soft surfaces,
and it has a silent ventilation system.
Unfortunately,
the new TMS only had a working life as a sound studio for a few
years. With the new commercial way of working introduced in
1993 (snappily named 'Producer Choice') each studio had to bid for
bookings in competition with those outside the BBC. Despite its
superb facilities it was priced too high and therefore did not get
the use it deserved. It struggled to pay its way for a year or
two until the decision was make to close it. It might seem
curious to some that closure was a better idea than cutting the hire
cost to attract business but that is the way an accountant's mind
seems to work.
Around
1995 the studio found a new use. It reopened as a 'virtual
reality' studio following a name change. It was considered
unwise to call it TC9 as the BBC policy in the '90s was to close
studios, not open new ones. Senior BBC management might not
understand. Therefore it became TC0 ('TC zero') which
also had a nice 'virtual' ring to it.
The
studio was initially equipped with a 2-D system called 'Virtual
Scenario'. Around 1997 this was upgraded to a 3-D system called
'Free-D'. Richard Russell worked on this project. He
informs me that Free-D was first shown publicly at IBC in 1997.
It had been developed by BBC Research Dept. and many people thought
it would be very popular with programme makers. The system
allows actors or presenters to move freely in front of a blue screen
whilst the camera can track, pan, tilt and zoom. Hand-held
cameras can also be used. Sensors detect all these parameters
partly by looking at 'targets' mounted all over the studio grid and
the system automatically locks the background behind the artist.
This background can be a photograph or more interestingly a
computer-generated 3D world.
I
mentioned 'blue screen' but it was even cleverer than that. The
cameras had a ring of blue LEDs around their lens and the cyclorama
and floor were made of grey fabric impregnated with millions of
highly reflective glass beads (rather like a road sign). Thus
the camera saw the cloth as bright blue but the actors could be lit
in any colour to match the background.
Free-D
was a great idea but sadly few producers initially liked it or
understood its implications and only a handful of VR programmes were
made in TC0. These included Record Breakers Gold -
although in fact this show probably only used the 2-D system..
Richard Russell also recalls another children's series, probably
broadcast live on Sundays, which involved children searching for
objects that they couldn't see (although the viewers could, through
the magic of VR).
As a
small studio, TC0 was perhaps not the best environment to fully
explore the potential of Free-D. Therefore, VR 'targets' were
installed in the grid of some large studios. One quarter of TC4
still has them mounted between the lighting bars - I lit an
experimental VR programme in there in July 1997. TC1 was fully
equipped for Fightbox and Elstree D for the series Bamzooki.
Shortly
after the studio closed as a sound studio, the control room was
converted into a dubbing suite. Thus it was not possible for it
to become the new vision and production control area for TC0.
At one end of the main studio is a timber bridge running across the
room's width that was originally intended to be used for
musicians. A single control room for sound, vision and
production was constructed beneath it. This effectively reduced
the studio's length by about eight feet. A basic floor-mounted
lighting truss was constructed within the studio - the ceiling would
not take the weight.
VR
proved to be a commercial disappointment and after a few years -
probably in 1999 - the gear was removed and the studio was booked for
a conventional series (if that's the right expression) when The
Chris Moyles Show took up residence. This went out on
digital channel UK Play. When this series ended after some
months it was followed by another daily show - The Phone Zone.
Some time later this show moved upstairs to TC10 to become TOTP@Play
and TC0 became the home of BBC Choice's entertainment news show - Liquid
News which began broadcasting in May 2000. When this in
turn moved upstairs after nearly a couple of years to what had become
TC11 the studio was occupied by the presenters of the CBeebies
channel from February 2002 until the end of 2007. In January
2008 they rather surprisingly moved to studio 4 at Teddington.
It
seems that the studio was probably not used at all in 2008.
However, one wonders how many production managers even knew it
existed. There was a rumour for a while that it might be turned
back into a sound studio but nothing came of that. In
2009 it was used for the occasional single camera shoot and as a
rehearsal room for sitcoms. Early in 2010 the BBC's research
department was relocated from Kingswood Warren to White City.
TC0 has been allocated to them now for their experiments, since there
is no suitable space in the White City building. Thus, the
department that devised the various virtual reality systems has, so
to speak, returned home.
Incidentally
- the old sound control room was itself turned into an ad-hoc TV
studio for a kids' live interactive puppet series called Nelly Nut
in 2004. This formally become known as TC12 and for a
while was the home of one or two CBBC programmes including Sportsround.
It then became the continuity studio for CBBC - the 21st century
version of the famous broom cupboard. Early in 2008 this moved
to a room in the East Tower and the studio was closed.
Around
2000 an area on the ground floor of stage 5 previously used as the
lamp store was converted into 'The Foyer'. (The lamp store
moved to the scenery block). The Foyer is a large area capable
of holding two studio audiences - about 650 people - before they make
their way to their studios. It contains a licenced coffee bar
and also a BBC shop selling merchandise. It took many, many
years for the BBC to realise that an audience that had been kept
waiting outside in the January rain for half an hour or more before
coming into the studio would not laugh as loud as one that was nice
and warm and had had a glass of wine.
|
 |
The
Centre following the completion of stages 5 and 6. It's pretty
clear that several architects were involved in the design of each
section of the spur. I wonder what Graham Dawbarn would have
thought of what they did to his original building.
Personally,
I think the original spur and stage 5 are particularly disappointing
but the design of stage 6 is much more in keeping with Dawbarn's
design. It contains several details and features that echo the
main block and its mass is far better balanced. It's still a
shame that the bricks are not the same colour! |
Stage
6 was,
as we have seen, very nearly a superb television studio that would
have been the envy of the whole industry. Nearly, but not
quite. During the '70s and '80s the entertainment department
had been putting pressure on the BBC's senior management to construct
a new studio in the remaining space at the end of the spur at
TVC. It would replace Television Theatre but would be far more
flexible in its use. It was to have a floor area about 98 x
85ft wall to wall but with the addition of large audience rostra on
two levels. (So somewhat larger in both length and width than
LWT's studio 1). The BBC producers were fed up with the way
that LWT's big shows looked so much more impressive than theirs made
in TC8. Even TC1 didn't look as good once you filled it with
the usual mobile seating.
|
 |
|
 |
|
This
model was built during the 1980s to show how the new TC9 would look
when completed. What is notable about this is the extraordinary
detail of the model itself! It alone must have cost thousands
to make.
The
colour of the elevation is quite striking and I wonder how it would
have looked when completed. |
Detailed
plans were drawn up over several years for this new TC9. It
was to have a grid height of 72 ft (TC1 is 'only' 45ft high) which
would enable scenery to be flown on counterweight systems.
There would be a permanent audience rostra seating 400 which could be
extended with moveable 'wings' and the studio would have its own
foyer, make-up, wardrobe and scenery handling areas. There was
even to be a large band room with its own control room - oddly
duplicating the new music studio a few yards away in stage 5 which
was almost exactly the same size.
Terry
Brett was asked to represent the lighting side of things. He
was a busy LD at the time but attended many meetings of the steering
committee. He tells me that he is still waiting for someone to
inform him that the project has been cancelled - let alone thank him
for all the work he put in.
Terry
tells me a couple of problems with the studio's design that had to be
overcome. One concerned the trough that was to run round the
bottom of the cyclorama so that groundrow lights could be hidden,
thus creating an 'infinity cyc'. One challenge was how to
create this trough whilst still leaving enough headroom in the news
department garage beneath. Terry describes another issue that arose:
|
'...being
the BBC it had to have handrails to protect the terminally
stupid. However, in the end the trough lid became the safety
device on the outer side. The trough had to be engineered to
allow camera tracking when the studio was in sitcom mode and the
cover strong enough to take camera cranes and just about anything
else that could be thrown at it. Also it had to be deployed
quickly so as to speed up turn-rounds. The final solution was
to have the trough covered by a concrete 'lid' which could be
hydraulically raised. Now as most builders at that time worked
to the nearest inch at best, the construction of this monstrosity was
going to be a challenge. However, unbelievably the challenge
was met!
Secondly,
there were problems in keeping the studio ventilated. With such a
high cyclorama containing the heat [someone] came up with the idea of
dropping the ventilation to the level of the lighting rig. Now
this brought some strong protest from many, not the least me.
The amount of space lost in the hanging rig would have been
unbearable. It was then suggested that the ventilation trunking
should be flexible and fitted to the LX bar suspension. i.e. as
the bars came down, the trunking came down with it - albeit a few
feet above the bar itself. This was built and a demo section
was installed somewhere in the depths of Woodlands.
Such
was the ability of the old BBC to innovate - where did that all
go? In retrospect the noise from those pop riveted lamps
heating up and cooling down would have given sound something to think about.'
|
Before
stage 6 was built, the ring road past TC8 came to an abrupt end and a
ramp took it down to the level of the front car park. Terry
tells me that somewhere under the ramp a couple of experimental
sections of trough were built complete with hydraulic lids. He
even has some video of the contraption in operation. I wonder
if it's still buried under there...???
Cameraman
Jeff Naylor was asked for his advice on a particular issue...
|
'One
addition to the plans for the New TV Theatre was for a remote-head
camera crane such as a Louma - I distinctly remember the plans from a
meeting where I discussed where it could be mounted and the
compromises it would force on the lighting rig, in particular the
followspot positions - as I wanted to hang it over the edge of the Circle!'
|
I see
that some things never change.
|
 |
|
The
planned TC9 at ground level. Click on the image for a larger view.
Wood
Lane is bottom right and the music studio top left is the current
TC0 (although it was actually built a slightly different shape.)
Its sound control room became TC12 for a while.
The
line down the centre of the plan indicating the left wall of the
studio denotes the limit of construction. Everything to its
left was built - everything to the right remains a 'what if.'
The
adjustable side audience units in the theatre are shown with dotted
lines. The floor area of the studio would have been somewhat
larger than TC8 but with the addition of two tiers of audience seating.
Incidentally,
the area marked as lamp store and scenic store is now used as 'The Foyer'.
|
|
 |
|
A
section through the proposed studio. Click on the image for an
enlarged view.
Note
the two tiers of seating and the side 'boxes.' To get an idea
of scale, the cyclorama on the right which is shown dropped into the
trough is marked as being 36ft high. Only the largest studios
today have tracks for a cyc of just 30ft height. The height of
the grid over the studio floor is 22m which is an astonishing 72
feet! This would have enabled huge scenery units to have been
flown out of sight. The man shown on the gantry on the right is
at the height of a grid in a 'normal' studio.
Note
the lines drawn to indicate angles and possible positions for follow spots.
The
cars indicated at the bottom are in the underground car park.
It can be seen that the groundrow trough would have reduced the
headroom in that area in the car park.
The
large empty 'box' top left is an area that would have had
ventilation plant and other services.
|
The
idea was to close TV Theatre and transfer Wogan, or the show's
successor, to the new studio. It would also of course be
available for other big Saturday night shows. There is little
doubt that this studio would have become the best equipped LE studio
in the country and would have been much in demand today for big
gameshows and music/entertainment shows. Sadly, despite all the
work done on the project it was abandoned very soon after Michael
Checkland became DG. The studio had been enthusiastically
supported by Bill Cotton but it was cancelled within a week of his
retiring from the job of Managing Director of Television in 1989.
It was
becoming fashionable with some around that time to declare the age of
the big TV studio over. Also, the new director general and his
assistant John Birt were introducing far more stringent financial
control over all the BBC's costs and expenditure - so with
accountants rather than programme makers running the BBC the project
didn't stand a chance. If only construction had begun a few
months earlier it would almost certainly have been completed and now
be the busiest studio in London!
Instead,
TC1 - which was due to be refurbished - would be given a more
fundamental refit, with built-in retractable audience seating and
redesigned stairs with a new glazed foyer area at first floor level
for the audience. After nearly three years work the 'new' TC1
opened in January 1991 but was not a patch on what might have
been. I imagine that the managers of BBC Studios wish they now
had that 'nearly but not quite' studio with its large audience and
plenty of floor area to rival Fountain or TLS studio 1.
The
legacy of the old plans can be seen in the rather oddly shaped curved
podium that extends from the base of Stage 6 towards the Horseshoe
carpark. This was part only of what was going to be the grand
entrance to the new theatre leading in turn to the foyer on the first
floor and taking audiences into the main studio auditorium at the
back of the seating (as happens in West End theatres). There
was even an idea for LED lights announcing tonight's performance
displayed around the semi circular facade above the entrance
doors. Stage 5's rear elevation makes a bit more sense too when
the original proposals are understood.
So
what did become of stage 6? Well, it became the BBC's News
Centre. It was opened in July 1998 by (some might say
appropriately,) Sir Christopher Bland. It seemed a good idea to
John Birt to bring radio news away from Broadcasting House in central
London to join TV news several miles away at Television Centre.
Guess what? The journalists didn't like it. They still
don't. So Greg Dyke (a man who actually understands television)
gave the go-ahead to rebuild much of Broadcasting House to take
the radio news back there as well as the TV news.
Stage
6 was also finished off with a new reception area complete with Henry
Moore sculpture (now removed), facing Wood Lane. It all looks
very smart and businesslike. The old reception became the
'stage door' and is still occasionally featured on various shows.
Stage
6 opened in July 1998 and the Real IRA tried to blow it up in March
2001 with a taxi parked outside. Fortunately, nobody was
hurt. Although the damage looked superficial (one assumes that
such an attack had been foreseen) it took about two years before the
scaffolding came down and an even stronger bombproof wall of glass
was revealed. Oh - and you're not allowed to park or leave your
bike outside any more.
|
 |
TV
Centre reception the day after the bomb. |
TVC
has come under attack on several occasions over the years.
Apart from the Real IRA, it has been surrounded by thousands of
screaming pubescent girls when bands such as Take That have performed
on Saturday morning kids' shows. If you don't think that sounds
too bad you should have been there!
Only
slightly less scary was the occasion when evangelical militant
Christians tried to prevent people from entering or leaving the
building during the Jerry Springer the Opera controversy in
January 2005. More recently, when leader of the BNP Nick
Griffin appeared on Question Time in TC6 on 22nd October 2009,
several hundred angry protestors demonstrated outside the gate -
about 25 breaking in as far as the Stage Door (the former main
reception). On the same night three other audience shows were
also being recorded - Harry Hill's TV Burp (TC3), Friday
Night With Jonathan Ross (TC4) and Piers Morgan's Real Lives
(TC8). About 1,000 ordinary punters with tickets therefore had
to be got into the building past the shouting protestors - as well as
the QT audience and the panelists - but somehow the security staff
did it - and got them out again safely.
I
should declare an interest here, having lit the televised version of Jerry
Springer the Opera, several editions of Live and Kicking
and been in the building lighting TV Burp on the night of the
BNP Question Time. (For the record, the ignorance shown
by many of the protestors of what was actually depicted in Jerry
Springer the Opera was astonishing
and proved to me how otherwise intelligent people can be hoodwinked
into believing anything if instructed by skillful and manipulative
leaders. At least I had seen the show - several times - which
most of those interviewed clearly had not.)
Other
incidents have included the women's invasion of the 6 o'Clock News
in 1988 when Sue Lawley kept her cool and Nicholas Witchell sat on a
lesbian. Meanwhile, in March 2000 a media studies student (no
really) vaulted over the low turnstile in main reception and found
his way to the main newsroom. He is said to have gone on the
rampage, causing thousands of pounds worth of damage, getting 'within
feet' of Anna Ford. Having smashed monitors and thrown a coffee
table through a window, he explained afterwards that he was upset by
Greg Dyke's style of leadership and thought the license fee was too
high. Apparently he threatened to kill anyone who tried to stop
him but eventually somebody did and he ended up in a mental
hospital. Still, A* for the essay he wrote afterwards so
probably worth it.
This
happened incidentally after security had been tightened following
the murder of Jill Dando. Since then, access from reception
into the building has been completely redesigned with a high glass
wall containing motorised turnstiles that only let one person through very
slowly and can, in theory, trap someone half way round.
Then
there was the invasion of the live Lotto draw in TC4 during Jet Set
on 20th May 2006. This was by six members of Fathers for
Justice, one of whom allegedly received a distinctly less than
friendly welcome from presenter Eamonn Holmes. The director cut
to a close-up of him remaining calm and collected but those working
on the show have told me what was happening just out of shot!
Respect due to Mr Holmes. Soon afterwards, Camelot decided to
move the draws to the rather more secure ex-British Forces
Broadcasting Service (SSVC) studios run by Arqiva in Buckinghamshire.
Construction
and refurbishment have continued at TC for the whole of its
life. Individual rooms and whole floors have from time to time
been gutted and rebuilt. Studios too are given refurbs every
few years. The running of the building itself was taken out of
the BBC's hands in 2001 and became the responsibility of a company
called Land Securities Trillium.
The
early days of this new operation were sometimes not as smooth as
they might have been. A studio resources manager has told me a
story that cannot possibly be true. Allegedly, shortly after
Land Securities Trillium took over, he phoned the new number to ask
for the air conditioning to be made cooler in the studio he was
working in. He was connected with an office in the north of
England. The operator requested the studio's 'room number',
what floor it was on, the address of Television Centre and various
other details. Finally, he was told the job number and informed
that the work would be carried out next Tuesday. Thankfully, I
believe this and other similar teething troubles were ironed out
within a few weeks.
In
July 2006 the contract to supply facilities management passed to a
company called Johnson Controls. I assume they too learnt
pretty quickly to adjust studio temperatures faster than next Tuesday.
|